By Soccer Coach Albert M. Luongo
Premier League Soccer/football: The FA Cup game was played on January 29, 2008. The final score was Arsenal 3, New Castle United 0. New Castle United could not compete effectively against Arsenal, as they frequently could not get out of the midfield to launch concerted attacks. Both teams used an identical formation of 4-4-2. Only one goal was scored in the first half. At 39 minutes into play, Arsenal’s Emmanuel Adebayor headed a cross past the United’s goalkeeper Given, making the score 1-0.
At the beginning of the second half, New Castle United got off to a good start and held their own for about ten minutes. After that they had difficulty mounting concerted attacks. Some long balls and flicks up field indicated that they were getting desperate. For the most part, they were enervated and their defense seemed to be scrambling in disorder. At minute 71, Arsenal’s Mathieu Flamine put in a long shot taken about 10 yards outside the penalty area. This was a fantastic long shot. At the 79th minute, Arsenal’s Cesc Fabregas was unimpeded by United’s defense—they were scrambling as Fabergas got the third goal.
Review
The outcome of the match was predictable since Arsenal had good effective passing, they were more aggressive than United for winning the loose ball and overall they appeared to have more energy. This was apparent from the middle of the second half on. They played a good short ball game and their strong defense generally prevented coordinated New Castle’s attack buildups.
Except for a short period at the beginning of the second half, it was apparent that the the coaching of Arsene Wegner was showing its merit. In order to compete against strong teams, all players need to be in peak physical form. This is needed to prevent mistakes in everything—dribbling, passing, applying pressure to force the opponents to make passing mistakes. When a team has superior endurance, with matching skills of the opponent, they are most often the winners.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Sunday, May 25, 2008
No. 45—Italian Soccer—Inter Milan vs. Roma for the Coppa Italia—Roma’s had a Superior Passing Game
by Soccer Coach Albert M. Luongo
The final score of the game played in Rome on May 24, 2008 was Roma 2 to Inter Milan 1. Roma’s superior passing and aggressive play allowed them to maintain possession and control of the ball for a greater percentage of the game while Milan had difficulty in maintaining accurate constructive passes. Often Inter sent long balls or head flicks up-field (Hail Mary passes) that only amounted to ball recovery by Roma.
The first half was a clean game played mostly in the midfield with few good chances for scoring for either side. However at minute 35, Roma’s Mexes received the ball from a corner kick and kicked it passed Inter’s goalkeeper Toldo, who had no chance to save the shot. Mexes was completely unmarked, showing a problem with Inter’s defense. The score at the half was Rome 1 Inter Milan 0.
The second half got progressively rougher as time went on. Near the end of the match, players were going down left and right. At minute 9, Roma’s Perrotta passed the ball to a teammate at the left side of the goal. The ball was returned to Perrotta who scored with no chance for Milan’s goalkeeper Doni to save the shot. This gave Rome the lead of 2-0. However, several seconds before the goal, Roma’s Cassetti appeared to foul Milan’s Cesar. It is my opinion that this was a foul, but the referee allowed the play to continue.
At minute 15, Pele` (Vitor Hugh Gomes Passos) took a long shot from over 30 yards and off to the right of the goal. He scored with this amazing shot making the score 2 to 1.
Discussion
Roma certainly deserved to win the match. Their passing skills were accurate and they pressured Milan to get repossession of the ball. It seems to me that Milan’s endurance training could be increased to give them better timing and control of the ball.
Not discussed above, but worth mentioning was the positioning of Roma’s players near the end of the match. At around the time of 35 minutes into the second half, Roma appeared to retain all players on defense to hold their lead. While defensive play is the best strategy, playing all players in defense can upset the defensive team, be an overkill and a mistake. A few minutes later however, Roma went back to normal offensive and defensive play and held their lead.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
The final score of the game played in Rome on May 24, 2008 was Roma 2 to Inter Milan 1. Roma’s superior passing and aggressive play allowed them to maintain possession and control of the ball for a greater percentage of the game while Milan had difficulty in maintaining accurate constructive passes. Often Inter sent long balls or head flicks up-field (Hail Mary passes) that only amounted to ball recovery by Roma.
The first half was a clean game played mostly in the midfield with few good chances for scoring for either side. However at minute 35, Roma’s Mexes received the ball from a corner kick and kicked it passed Inter’s goalkeeper Toldo, who had no chance to save the shot. Mexes was completely unmarked, showing a problem with Inter’s defense. The score at the half was Rome 1 Inter Milan 0.
The second half got progressively rougher as time went on. Near the end of the match, players were going down left and right. At minute 9, Roma’s Perrotta passed the ball to a teammate at the left side of the goal. The ball was returned to Perrotta who scored with no chance for Milan’s goalkeeper Doni to save the shot. This gave Rome the lead of 2-0. However, several seconds before the goal, Roma’s Cassetti appeared to foul Milan’s Cesar. It is my opinion that this was a foul, but the referee allowed the play to continue.
At minute 15, Pele` (Vitor Hugh Gomes Passos) took a long shot from over 30 yards and off to the right of the goal. He scored with this amazing shot making the score 2 to 1.
Discussion
Roma certainly deserved to win the match. Their passing skills were accurate and they pressured Milan to get repossession of the ball. It seems to me that Milan’s endurance training could be increased to give them better timing and control of the ball.
Not discussed above, but worth mentioning was the positioning of Roma’s players near the end of the match. At around the time of 35 minutes into the second half, Roma appeared to retain all players on defense to hold their lead. While defensive play is the best strategy, playing all players in defense can upset the defensive team, be an overkill and a mistake. A few minutes later however, Roma went back to normal offensive and defensive play and held their lead.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Thursday, May 15, 2008
No. 44—Soccer—Huston Dynamo vs. Colorado Rapids: Teams Where Skills Could be Improved Upon
by Soccer Coach Albert M. Luongo
The final score of the game played in Houston on May 6, 2008 was 2 to 1. The game in the first half started off poorly as there was little control of the ball most of the time. Colorado in particular had poor trapping, very little continuity in passing and teamwork, and sent up field long balls that went essentially to no one. It seemed that they did not know what to do with the ball when they got possession of it. Furthermore, the ball was constantly going over the touchline for one reason or another making it uncomfortable to watch. However, toward the end of the game, Colorado began to look more professional.
The first half was also dominated by Houston. At Minute 17, Houston's Brian Ching had a breakaway (high school style). He approached the goalkeeper and chipped the ball over the Colorado goalkeeper Coundoul and also over the goal. A good effort on Ching’s part, but where was the Colorado defense? At minute 39 Ching had another similar breakaway. This time he passed the goalkeeper and easily pushed the ball into the net making the score 1 to 0. The Colorado defense was way up field.
The second half allowed for better and more professional play. As the half went on, both teams seemed to get the rhythm of the game and played a more settled game. But Houston still dominated much of this half. The major part of the game in this half was played in the midfield and so the defensive teams were not on display too often until the remaining part of the game where more action occurred near the goals.
At minute 68 Colorado’s Christian Gomez sent the ball to Cummings. Cummings was flanked on both sides by Houston defenders giving chase, but had a clear shot on goal while dribbling. His shot made the score 1 to 1. At minute 85, Colorado’s Ugo Ihemelu’s handball in the penalty area allowed for a penalty kick for Houston. DeRosario took the kick and scored making the final score 2 to 1.
Finally, in the last ten minutes of play, Colorado came alive, as they became more soccer-aggressive and looked more professional. They could not score however.
Discussion
Both teams , but especially Colorado, need more practice at the basics of trapping long balls, shielding, passing and team work. At times they looked good, but at other times they were sloppy with kicking the ball constantly over the touchline to save it from being in a dangerous situation. Several times the ball was flicked upfield, headed with no receiver in mind and also kept in the air for many touches to the ball with no attempt at settling it.
I liked DeRosario’s demeanor after scoring: He showed no victory display as is so often the case today when a player scores.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
The final score of the game played in Houston on May 6, 2008 was 2 to 1. The game in the first half started off poorly as there was little control of the ball most of the time. Colorado in particular had poor trapping, very little continuity in passing and teamwork, and sent up field long balls that went essentially to no one. It seemed that they did not know what to do with the ball when they got possession of it. Furthermore, the ball was constantly going over the touchline for one reason or another making it uncomfortable to watch. However, toward the end of the game, Colorado began to look more professional.
The first half was also dominated by Houston. At Minute 17, Houston's Brian Ching had a breakaway (high school style). He approached the goalkeeper and chipped the ball over the Colorado goalkeeper Coundoul and also over the goal. A good effort on Ching’s part, but where was the Colorado defense? At minute 39 Ching had another similar breakaway. This time he passed the goalkeeper and easily pushed the ball into the net making the score 1 to 0. The Colorado defense was way up field.
The second half allowed for better and more professional play. As the half went on, both teams seemed to get the rhythm of the game and played a more settled game. But Houston still dominated much of this half. The major part of the game in this half was played in the midfield and so the defensive teams were not on display too often until the remaining part of the game where more action occurred near the goals.
At minute 68 Colorado’s Christian Gomez sent the ball to Cummings. Cummings was flanked on both sides by Houston defenders giving chase, but had a clear shot on goal while dribbling. His shot made the score 1 to 1. At minute 85, Colorado’s Ugo Ihemelu’s handball in the penalty area allowed for a penalty kick for Houston. DeRosario took the kick and scored making the final score 2 to 1.
Finally, in the last ten minutes of play, Colorado came alive, as they became more soccer-aggressive and looked more professional. They could not score however.
Discussion
Both teams , but especially Colorado, need more practice at the basics of trapping long balls, shielding, passing and team work. At times they looked good, but at other times they were sloppy with kicking the ball constantly over the touchline to save it from being in a dangerous situation. Several times the ball was flicked upfield, headed with no receiver in mind and also kept in the air for many touches to the ball with no attempt at settling it.
I liked DeRosario’s demeanor after scoring: He showed no victory display as is so often the case today when a player scores.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Saturday, April 26, 2008
No. 43—Scotish, Italian Soccer—Glasgow Rangers vs. Fiorentina—The Rangers Strong Defense kept them from Losing
by Soccer Coach Albert M. Luongo
The final score of the game played on April 24, 2008 was 0 to 0 with both teams employing many players to help out in defense. It was an excellent game as both teams' strong defenses made few or no errors. While both teams prevented goals from scoring, Fiorentina (being the stronger team) played a good ground short-ball passing game, thus giving them excellent offensive play.
For the first 9 minutes however, Fiorentina was unsettled until about the time that Jorgensen sent a long shot sailing well over the Ranger’s goal. Following that, they settled down and began to put together offensive tactics and plays that lasted throughout the game: Their midfield offence and defense was excellent. The Italian team’s shielding skills were obvious, especially demonstrated by Argentina native Mario Santana. Their passing and trapping skills were superior to that of the Rangers.
As for the Scots, their best attack came when powerful and fast Darcherville dribbled past defenders on the left wing at 16 minutes into the game. He brought the ball in near the goal then placed it dangerously in front of it, but a teammate just missed getting to the ball. Why he was substituted-out about 5 minutes into the second half is beyond me?
The Rangers did not have the precise attacking skills of their opponents, but their defensive skills prevented them from losing: They managed to keep most of their team back in times of opponent attacks. As for offense, their long passes (made frequently from their goalkeeper) usually ended in interceptions.
Discussion
At times the Rangers, often seemed hold on to the traditional long-ball passing game when on the offense. They appeared to be in a transition--going from their traditional long-ball soccer style to the short-ball, ball-possession game. If so, they need to concentrate on better passing, trapping and shielding under pressure. Read my soccer books for a thorough understanding of these skills.
Fiorentina had excellent skills, but I believe that their endurance could have been better. Despite the excellent defense of the Rangers, a higher endurance could have won the day for Fiorentina as they dominated the midfield.
I found it interesting however, that in the last ten minutes or so, each team maintained their stride and did not try to force the ball into the net: This (over anxiety to score) can be a common occurrence with tie score games and generally does not produce a goal. So, both teams maintained self-control--the mark of excellent teams.
I was pleased to see a clean game. Both teams should be complemented for this play. Even the announcer commented about the lack of rough playing from the Scottish team. He apparently expected this type of play. The referee was excellent. He was firm and most likely the reason that the game had few serious fouls.
Here is a little story from my past. Years ago, I had refereed a game in Canada. About 10 minutes into play I stopped the game and exerted my authority. Players from one team were fiercely roughing-up their opponents with a high frequency: Their general tactics were to go for the legs and not the ball. These tactics was the roughest that I had experienced up to that time. I called that team’s coach onto the edge of the field and spoke to him so everyone could hear. Knowing well that the coach was behind these maneuvers, I told him, "I do not know what is going on here with your team, but if this type of rough play continues, I will discontinue the game."
The coach responded to me in a thick brogue, " That’s the way we play in Scotland". I responded with, "Well that is not the way we play in Canada", and restarted the game.
From that point on moreover, the excessive rough playing ceased and we enjoyed a nice soccer match--the way it is supposed to be played and the way I like to see it.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
The final score of the game played on April 24, 2008 was 0 to 0 with both teams employing many players to help out in defense. It was an excellent game as both teams' strong defenses made few or no errors. While both teams prevented goals from scoring, Fiorentina (being the stronger team) played a good ground short-ball passing game, thus giving them excellent offensive play.
For the first 9 minutes however, Fiorentina was unsettled until about the time that Jorgensen sent a long shot sailing well over the Ranger’s goal. Following that, they settled down and began to put together offensive tactics and plays that lasted throughout the game: Their midfield offence and defense was excellent. The Italian team’s shielding skills were obvious, especially demonstrated by Argentina native Mario Santana. Their passing and trapping skills were superior to that of the Rangers.
As for the Scots, their best attack came when powerful and fast Darcherville dribbled past defenders on the left wing at 16 minutes into the game. He brought the ball in near the goal then placed it dangerously in front of it, but a teammate just missed getting to the ball. Why he was substituted-out about 5 minutes into the second half is beyond me?
The Rangers did not have the precise attacking skills of their opponents, but their defensive skills prevented them from losing: They managed to keep most of their team back in times of opponent attacks. As for offense, their long passes (made frequently from their goalkeeper) usually ended in interceptions.
Discussion
At times the Rangers, often seemed hold on to the traditional long-ball passing game when on the offense. They appeared to be in a transition--going from their traditional long-ball soccer style to the short-ball, ball-possession game. If so, they need to concentrate on better passing, trapping and shielding under pressure. Read my soccer books for a thorough understanding of these skills.
Fiorentina had excellent skills, but I believe that their endurance could have been better. Despite the excellent defense of the Rangers, a higher endurance could have won the day for Fiorentina as they dominated the midfield.
I found it interesting however, that in the last ten minutes or so, each team maintained their stride and did not try to force the ball into the net: This (over anxiety to score) can be a common occurrence with tie score games and generally does not produce a goal. So, both teams maintained self-control--the mark of excellent teams.
I was pleased to see a clean game. Both teams should be complemented for this play. Even the announcer commented about the lack of rough playing from the Scottish team. He apparently expected this type of play. The referee was excellent. He was firm and most likely the reason that the game had few serious fouls.
Here is a little story from my past. Years ago, I had refereed a game in Canada. About 10 minutes into play I stopped the game and exerted my authority. Players from one team were fiercely roughing-up their opponents with a high frequency: Their general tactics were to go for the legs and not the ball. These tactics was the roughest that I had experienced up to that time. I called that team’s coach onto the edge of the field and spoke to him so everyone could hear. Knowing well that the coach was behind these maneuvers, I told him, "I do not know what is going on here with your team, but if this type of rough play continues, I will discontinue the game."
The coach responded to me in a thick brogue, " That’s the way we play in Scotland". I responded with, "Well that is not the way we play in Canada", and restarted the game.
From that point on moreover, the excessive rough playing ceased and we enjoyed a nice soccer match--the way it is supposed to be played and the way I like to see it.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Friday, April 25, 2008
No. 42—German Soccer, Bundeslige—FC Nuremberg vs. FC Bayern Munich: A Good Defensive Game to Watch, but Ended Sloppy
by Soccer Coach Albert M. Luongo
The final score of the Bundeslige game, FC Nuremberg vs. FC Bayern Munich, played on March 29, 2008 was 1 to 1. It was a great spectator game as both teams played a good ground passing game with excellent defense except on both occasions when goals were scored.
Nuremberg dominated this half. At minute 44 Nurenberg’s Zvjezdan Misimovic was unmarked and kicked a long shot from the left side of the goal into the upper right hand corner of the net. This shot just missed the cross bar and the upright. There was no chance for Bayern Munich’s goalkeeper Kahn to save this shot. However, Misimovic should have been marked.
During the middle of second half, Munich seemed to come alive. And at minute 81, substitute Podolski became open in front of the goal. Luca Toni sent a nice pass to unmarked Podolski, who scored making the score 1-1. There was no chance for Nuremberg goalkeeper Blazek to stop this shot.
Discussion
Both teams defenses (see the author's books) kept the score down, but on two occasions (once for each team) a goal was let in due to players caught watching the ball and not marking strikers. At about the last 8 to 10 minutes, the play and players became undone as both teams tried frantically to sent the ball up to the opponents goal--they seemed to have thrown caution to the wind. Had one of these teams played aggressively, yet with care as earlier in the game, they may have scored a winning point. However, it seems that each team ran out of steam, making aggressive offensive play difficult—the probable cause for the lack of each team's energy at the end of the game is not enough endurance training.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
The final score of the Bundeslige game, FC Nuremberg vs. FC Bayern Munich, played on March 29, 2008 was 1 to 1. It was a great spectator game as both teams played a good ground passing game with excellent defense except on both occasions when goals were scored.
Nuremberg dominated this half. At minute 44 Nurenberg’s Zvjezdan Misimovic was unmarked and kicked a long shot from the left side of the goal into the upper right hand corner of the net. This shot just missed the cross bar and the upright. There was no chance for Bayern Munich’s goalkeeper Kahn to save this shot. However, Misimovic should have been marked.
During the middle of second half, Munich seemed to come alive. And at minute 81, substitute Podolski became open in front of the goal. Luca Toni sent a nice pass to unmarked Podolski, who scored making the score 1-1. There was no chance for Nuremberg goalkeeper Blazek to stop this shot.
Discussion
Both teams defenses (see the author's books) kept the score down, but on two occasions (once for each team) a goal was let in due to players caught watching the ball and not marking strikers. At about the last 8 to 10 minutes, the play and players became undone as both teams tried frantically to sent the ball up to the opponents goal--they seemed to have thrown caution to the wind. Had one of these teams played aggressively, yet with care as earlier in the game, they may have scored a winning point. However, it seems that each team ran out of steam, making aggressive offensive play difficult—the probable cause for the lack of each team's energy at the end of the game is not enough endurance training.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Sunday, April 20, 2008
No. 32—Soccer, Spanish: Villarreal vs. Barcelona: Barcelona Dominated the Mid Field but Could Not Penetrate Villarreal’s Strong Defense
By Soccer Coach Albert M. Luongo
The match was held on January 24, 2008 and ended in a scoreless tie. Villarreal, in very bright yellow uniforms, could not seem put together cohesive attacks from the midfield, which Barcelona dominated. Barcelona’s midfield was strong and their passing attacks were excellent, except when near Villarreal’s defended goal. Villarreal had a strong defense and required that most of Barcelona’s shots at the goal be taken from well outside the penalty area. They did make one defensive mistake however, they allowed Iniesta to be unmarked at the 77th minute. Iniesta, all alone in front of the net, could have scored wining goal, but he missed.
Barcelona's Leo Messi was installed into the game at the start of the halftime. He had been out on about 5 weeks on an injury. He played well as he set up a few chances for his team to score, but the team could not make the right connection to score.
Barcelona also maintained a strong defense, but was less tested as many of Villarreal’s attacks were generally thwarted in the midfield. And most the shots on goal were from outside the penalty area. Barcelona outclassed them as they settled the ball from nearly all passes. Villerreal sent too many desperate long passes up field and most were intercepted as could be observed as the ball settled down. They also made some trapping mistakes. These mistakes could be related to their lack of optimum conditioning.
It was a clean game for the first three quarters, but it got a little rough in the last quarter.
Here is my analysis of the game.
Barcelona owned the midfield for most of the game with Villarreal’s disappointing passing.
This is what I believe went right and wrong for Barcelona.
Barcelona was aggressive to win the loose ball and had the energy to constantly make good passes and traps under pressure of nearby opponents. But, they met their match when they went against Villarreal’s defense. Their own defense disallowed any goals from being scored--there were only a few attempts at scoring by Villarreal.
This is what I believe went right and wrong for Villarreal.
Even though Villarreal could not develop many attacks on goal, they made a great showing with their defense. Goalkeeper Diego Lopez well defended the goal along with taking command of his defensive team as elaborated on in my books. On the attacking side, the team did not appear too aggressive to pressure their opponents into making passing mistakes, yet they made several passing mistakes of their own; but fortunately, their strong defense kept them from losing: This is commendable. However, I believe that they could improve offensively with better conditioning.
A further note: If I were the manager of this team, I would do something about the blaring color of the "phosphorescent" yellow uniforms. I could be wrong, but if I was playing against this team, one glance would immediately alert me as to where the opponents are located and aid in the distribution of passes to relatively unguarded teammates. Even though one might say that the bright color also helps Villarreal’s players easily identify their own teammates, my opinion is that it is more disadvantagous than advantagous.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
The match was held on January 24, 2008 and ended in a scoreless tie. Villarreal, in very bright yellow uniforms, could not seem put together cohesive attacks from the midfield, which Barcelona dominated. Barcelona’s midfield was strong and their passing attacks were excellent, except when near Villarreal’s defended goal. Villarreal had a strong defense and required that most of Barcelona’s shots at the goal be taken from well outside the penalty area. They did make one defensive mistake however, they allowed Iniesta to be unmarked at the 77th minute. Iniesta, all alone in front of the net, could have scored wining goal, but he missed.
Barcelona's Leo Messi was installed into the game at the start of the halftime. He had been out on about 5 weeks on an injury. He played well as he set up a few chances for his team to score, but the team could not make the right connection to score.
Barcelona also maintained a strong defense, but was less tested as many of Villarreal’s attacks were generally thwarted in the midfield. And most the shots on goal were from outside the penalty area. Barcelona outclassed them as they settled the ball from nearly all passes. Villerreal sent too many desperate long passes up field and most were intercepted as could be observed as the ball settled down. They also made some trapping mistakes. These mistakes could be related to their lack of optimum conditioning.
It was a clean game for the first three quarters, but it got a little rough in the last quarter.
Here is my analysis of the game.
Barcelona owned the midfield for most of the game with Villarreal’s disappointing passing.
This is what I believe went right and wrong for Barcelona.
Barcelona was aggressive to win the loose ball and had the energy to constantly make good passes and traps under pressure of nearby opponents. But, they met their match when they went against Villarreal’s defense. Their own defense disallowed any goals from being scored--there were only a few attempts at scoring by Villarreal.
This is what I believe went right and wrong for Villarreal.
Even though Villarreal could not develop many attacks on goal, they made a great showing with their defense. Goalkeeper Diego Lopez well defended the goal along with taking command of his defensive team as elaborated on in my books. On the attacking side, the team did not appear too aggressive to pressure their opponents into making passing mistakes, yet they made several passing mistakes of their own; but fortunately, their strong defense kept them from losing: This is commendable. However, I believe that they could improve offensively with better conditioning.
A further note: If I were the manager of this team, I would do something about the blaring color of the "phosphorescent" yellow uniforms. I could be wrong, but if I was playing against this team, one glance would immediately alert me as to where the opponents are located and aid in the distribution of passes to relatively unguarded teammates. Even though one might say that the bright color also helps Villarreal’s players easily identify their own teammates, my opinion is that it is more disadvantagous than advantagous.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Tuesday, April 1, 2008
Blog 31--Soccer: Real Madrid vs. Athletico Madrid: Real Madrid Controlled the Game
by Soccer Coach Albert M. Luongo
On Jan. 20, 2008 Real Madrid had a victory over Athletico Madrid. The score ended Real Madrid 2 Athletico Madrid 0. While Athletico had several chances to score during the game, most were saved by Real Madrid’s goalkeeper Castillas. He had made many spectacular saves, giving an indication that his defense was somewhat wanting. But, Real Madrid out passed and preformed Athletico. Real Madrid also worked the ball up field with much better passing than the opponents. The results were that there were more coordinated attacks by the former and only sporadic attacks by the latter. The final score ended about right.
The first goal came when Robinho passed the ball to Raul from the left wing area. Raul unimpeded by any defenders scored at 40 seconds into the match: Just prior to the goal, a defensive error by an Athletico defender caused the ball to not clear properly enabling Robinho to place the ball in front of the net and to Raul. Their second goal came when Ruud Van Nestelrooy scored from a corner kick. He side volleyed it with his left foot with no chance for anyone to defend against it—making it 2 to 0. No further goals were scored.
The referee, in my opinion, made a serious bad call by giving a yellow card to an Athletico Madrid player who made a perfect legal slide tackle to Robinho at 35 minutes into play. Robinho went down after the tackle, but the tackle was perfectly legal. He should have also awarded a penalty kick against Athletico Madrid at 12 minutes into the second half when Atletico’s player took down Real Madrid’s Salgado--kicking the back of his leg in the penalty area. After that the game got quite rough. It was apparent to me that the referee lost control of the game.
Review:
It seemed obvious to me that Athletico needs to be in better physical condition in order to reduce mistakes on the field and to better compete with a team of the caliber of Real Madrid. Near the end of the match, Athletico made passing and trapping errors that could be generally attributed to exhausted players.
Both teams could use improvements in their defense.
Even though these two teams are rivals, there is no excuse for their fouling. Athletico’s roughness exceeded that of Madrid. The referee should have had better control of the game following the FIFA Laws of the Game.
Note 1. At the FIFA web site it is necessary to scroll down to read it.
Note 2 : I do not give out the referee's name for their own security.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
On Jan. 20, 2008 Real Madrid had a victory over Athletico Madrid. The score ended Real Madrid 2 Athletico Madrid 0. While Athletico had several chances to score during the game, most were saved by Real Madrid’s goalkeeper Castillas. He had made many spectacular saves, giving an indication that his defense was somewhat wanting. But, Real Madrid out passed and preformed Athletico. Real Madrid also worked the ball up field with much better passing than the opponents. The results were that there were more coordinated attacks by the former and only sporadic attacks by the latter. The final score ended about right.
The first goal came when Robinho passed the ball to Raul from the left wing area. Raul unimpeded by any defenders scored at 40 seconds into the match: Just prior to the goal, a defensive error by an Athletico defender caused the ball to not clear properly enabling Robinho to place the ball in front of the net and to Raul. Their second goal came when Ruud Van Nestelrooy scored from a corner kick. He side volleyed it with his left foot with no chance for anyone to defend against it—making it 2 to 0. No further goals were scored.
The referee, in my opinion, made a serious bad call by giving a yellow card to an Athletico Madrid player who made a perfect legal slide tackle to Robinho at 35 minutes into play. Robinho went down after the tackle, but the tackle was perfectly legal. He should have also awarded a penalty kick against Athletico Madrid at 12 minutes into the second half when Atletico’s player took down Real Madrid’s Salgado--kicking the back of his leg in the penalty area. After that the game got quite rough. It was apparent to me that the referee lost control of the game.
Review:
It seemed obvious to me that Athletico needs to be in better physical condition in order to reduce mistakes on the field and to better compete with a team of the caliber of Real Madrid. Near the end of the match, Athletico made passing and trapping errors that could be generally attributed to exhausted players.
Both teams could use improvements in their defense.
Even though these two teams are rivals, there is no excuse for their fouling. Athletico’s roughness exceeded that of Madrid. The referee should have had better control of the game following the FIFA Laws of the Game.
Note 1. At the FIFA web site it is necessary to scroll down to read it.
Note 2 : I do not give out the referee's name for their own security.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Thursday, March 27, 2008
No. 41—Spanish Soccer—Real Madrid vs. Valencia: Real Dominated Offensively but Lost Defensively
by Soccer Coach Albert M. Luongo
On March 23, 3008, Valencia beat Real Madrid at Madrid 3-2. Most of the game was dominated by Real Madrid's attacks on goal, but Valencia managed to thwart most Real Madrid’s attempts at scoring.
The goals in the first half were scored in the following manner. At minute 33, Valencia’s David Villa controlled the ball in a breakaway and caught Real’s defense off guard: It looked like Real's offside trap failed. He dribbled up to about the penalty spot and kicked the ball into the net. One minute later, Real’s Rabino sent a long ball to Raul’s head as he was standing about 7 yards directly in the center of the goal. He headed it into the net with no chance for Valencia’s goalkeeper Hilderbrand to stop it.
The goals in the second half went like this. At 11 minutes in, with no one guarding Raul, he received a pass in front of the goal with only the opposing goalkeeper to his front. He easily shot the ball into the net. At minute 21, the equalizer came when Villa scored his second goal on a penalty kick: The keeper went right and the ball went left making the score 2-2. The penalty came when Real’s Cannavaro pushed down Valencia’s Silva in the penalty area. The final goal came at minute 43 when once again Real Madrid’s defense was caught too far up field. Angel Arizmendi of Valencia received a long pass at the right wing. He trapped the ball and curled in towards the goal. Only one defender was to his front. He managed to dribble the ball (a few yards in parallel with the goal line) in towards the goal after beating the defender. With no other defenders near, Real’s goalkeeper Castillas only opposed him. With only a slight angle to the goal, he shot the ball passed Castillas making the score 3-2.
Valancia had only a few chances to score in the second half as the ball was mostly played at the other end of the field. This fact made it apparent that Real Madrid’s players became overconfident due to the numerous scoring opportunities causing them to drop their defensive guard. Nevertheless, the game was exciting and action packed with few dull moments. The referee should have called more fouls however.
Discussion:
What circumstances were attributed to losing the game for a team that continually dominated the forward line of attack? There are two obvious factors: Lack of concern for defense and causing a foul to take place in the penalty area. These are described succinctly:
Defense: I believe that the first and third goal was due to the offside trap backfiring. I have never been a big fan of the offside trap as it can be fatal when it goes wrong. This can and did leave the goal defenseless.
Penalties (or excessive roughness): Fouling a player in and around the goal area can cause a defeat: in this case it did cause a defeat.
Valencia, it seems, played a strong defensive. Many attempts on scoring by Real Madrid were stopped. And, it seemed that Real Madrid became over confidant based upon their dominance near their opponent’s goal. When Valencia had a chance to score, they took advantage of the Real’s over-confidence: This type of football (soccer), where a team is strong in defense but weak in offense, more than occasionally wins the match.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
On March 23, 3008, Valencia beat Real Madrid at Madrid 3-2. Most of the game was dominated by Real Madrid's attacks on goal, but Valencia managed to thwart most Real Madrid’s attempts at scoring.
The goals in the first half were scored in the following manner. At minute 33, Valencia’s David Villa controlled the ball in a breakaway and caught Real’s defense off guard: It looked like Real's offside trap failed. He dribbled up to about the penalty spot and kicked the ball into the net. One minute later, Real’s Rabino sent a long ball to Raul’s head as he was standing about 7 yards directly in the center of the goal. He headed it into the net with no chance for Valencia’s goalkeeper Hilderbrand to stop it.
The goals in the second half went like this. At 11 minutes in, with no one guarding Raul, he received a pass in front of the goal with only the opposing goalkeeper to his front. He easily shot the ball into the net. At minute 21, the equalizer came when Villa scored his second goal on a penalty kick: The keeper went right and the ball went left making the score 2-2. The penalty came when Real’s Cannavaro pushed down Valencia’s Silva in the penalty area. The final goal came at minute 43 when once again Real Madrid’s defense was caught too far up field. Angel Arizmendi of Valencia received a long pass at the right wing. He trapped the ball and curled in towards the goal. Only one defender was to his front. He managed to dribble the ball (a few yards in parallel with the goal line) in towards the goal after beating the defender. With no other defenders near, Real’s goalkeeper Castillas only opposed him. With only a slight angle to the goal, he shot the ball passed Castillas making the score 3-2.
Valancia had only a few chances to score in the second half as the ball was mostly played at the other end of the field. This fact made it apparent that Real Madrid’s players became overconfident due to the numerous scoring opportunities causing them to drop their defensive guard. Nevertheless, the game was exciting and action packed with few dull moments. The referee should have called more fouls however.
Discussion:
What circumstances were attributed to losing the game for a team that continually dominated the forward line of attack? There are two obvious factors: Lack of concern for defense and causing a foul to take place in the penalty area. These are described succinctly:
Defense: I believe that the first and third goal was due to the offside trap backfiring. I have never been a big fan of the offside trap as it can be fatal when it goes wrong. This can and did leave the goal defenseless.
Penalties (or excessive roughness): Fouling a player in and around the goal area can cause a defeat: in this case it did cause a defeat.
Valencia, it seems, played a strong defensive. Many attempts on scoring by Real Madrid were stopped. And, it seemed that Real Madrid became over confidant based upon their dominance near their opponent’s goal. When Valencia had a chance to score, they took advantage of the Real’s over-confidence: This type of football (soccer), where a team is strong in defense but weak in offense, more than occasionally wins the match.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
No. 30--Soccer: United States vs Sweden in an Exhibition Game: USA Outplayed Sweden, But Only a Fair Game to Watch
by Soccer Coach Albert M. Luongo
The USA national team beat Sweden 2 to 0. USA defender Eddie Robinson scored early in the first half with a good goal. The shot came from his foot in a crowded defensive area. After that the game became sloppy on both sides with trapping and passing. Both teams had scoring chances but the USA’s attacks were slightly more coordinated. Even though both sides had difficulty making coordinated attacks, the USA team dominated most of the first half.
In the second half, the USA's set plays became more coordinated for longer periods, but they also had just as many poor periods. Sweden had a few attempts, but could not keep up with the Americans. USA used the wings and set plays at times with professional precision, but not on a continual basis. It would appear that Sweden was in poorer condition and their attacks were often below standard for such a team in this competition.
The game became a free for all near the end and several yellow cards were issued. However the referee had excellent control and prudently awarded yellow cards when violent fouls took place.
In the 46th minute, Sweden’s Bjarsmyr took down the American player Altidorre and USA was awarded a penalty kick. Landon Donovan scored goal no. 2. He had an excellent game in addition to scoring the penalty kick.
For the most part, Sweden’s goalkeeper as well as the defensive team made too many long kicks. They need to keep the ball on the ground more often and improve their trapping.
At times the playing was like a second division high school game while at other times (not too often) the play was professional. The final score of 2-0 was just about right for this match. Both teams could also use a stronger defense to reduce the number of dangerous shots on goal. Also, too many corner kicks were awarded due to the ball constantly crossing the goal line. However, the USA goalkeeper Brad Guzan made several good saves preventing Sweden from scoring.
Discussion:
If the USA intends to be a future competitor against top world class teams, it needs to be in better condition in order to maintain a consistent passing game. Also they need to practice their trapping under pressure. Both teams need to strengthen their defense to better protect the goal, receive more passes from the goalkeepers and to be stronger in order to prevent the ball from going over the goal line.
Sweden had a few more violent fouls against the USA. One such foul caused a penalty kick and one or two other fouls could have caused an ejection of a player.
It is my opinion that both teams needed to be in better physical condition to be more competitive against stronger teams.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself
The USA national team beat Sweden 2 to 0. USA defender Eddie Robinson scored early in the first half with a good goal. The shot came from his foot in a crowded defensive area. After that the game became sloppy on both sides with trapping and passing. Both teams had scoring chances but the USA’s attacks were slightly more coordinated. Even though both sides had difficulty making coordinated attacks, the USA team dominated most of the first half.
In the second half, the USA's set plays became more coordinated for longer periods, but they also had just as many poor periods. Sweden had a few attempts, but could not keep up with the Americans. USA used the wings and set plays at times with professional precision, but not on a continual basis. It would appear that Sweden was in poorer condition and their attacks were often below standard for such a team in this competition.
The game became a free for all near the end and several yellow cards were issued. However the referee had excellent control and prudently awarded yellow cards when violent fouls took place.
In the 46th minute, Sweden’s Bjarsmyr took down the American player Altidorre and USA was awarded a penalty kick. Landon Donovan scored goal no. 2. He had an excellent game in addition to scoring the penalty kick.
For the most part, Sweden’s goalkeeper as well as the defensive team made too many long kicks. They need to keep the ball on the ground more often and improve their trapping.
At times the playing was like a second division high school game while at other times (not too often) the play was professional. The final score of 2-0 was just about right for this match. Both teams could also use a stronger defense to reduce the number of dangerous shots on goal. Also, too many corner kicks were awarded due to the ball constantly crossing the goal line. However, the USA goalkeeper Brad Guzan made several good saves preventing Sweden from scoring.
Discussion:
If the USA intends to be a future competitor against top world class teams, it needs to be in better condition in order to maintain a consistent passing game. Also they need to practice their trapping under pressure. Both teams need to strengthen their defense to better protect the goal, receive more passes from the goalkeepers and to be stronger in order to prevent the ball from going over the goal line.
Sweden had a few more violent fouls against the USA. One such foul caused a penalty kick and one or two other fouls could have caused an ejection of a player.
It is my opinion that both teams needed to be in better physical condition to be more competitive against stronger teams.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself
Saturday, March 22, 2008
No. 40—USA vs. Canada Soccer—USA Displayed World Class Soccer Abilities
by Soccer Coach Albert M. Luongo
On March 20, 3008, USA beat Canada in Nashville TN 3 to 0. The USA dominated the field in this game with short, low-ball passing and aggressiveness to win the loose ball. Sometimes though, they were too aggressive as is often the case with American style soccer. One such extreme example of this was when USA’s Altidore’s inexcusable collision with Canada’s goalkeeper Wagner. It was followed by a shove to the goalkeeper. What was the referee thinking when he did not issue red card or even yellow card Altidore? With this said, this win means that USA will go on to play in the 2010 Olympics.
Canada on the other hand, had difficulty getting past the midfield and often backed off by not pressurizing their opponents. At times however Canada had a few good attacks and won the loose ball with good shoulder-charging but could not score. Several of their shots were in haste and went extremely high. Thus, the USA goalkeeper Chris Seitz was hardly tested during this game.
The scoring went like this. At minute 26, USA's Freddy Adu scored on a free kick from the right side about 5 yards from the penalty area. He curved the ball around a 2 man wall (a 3 or 4 man wall might have prevented the goal). The ball deflected off the right hand of Canada’s goalkeeper Wagner and went into the left-hand corner.
At approximately 3 minutes into the second half, USA’s Adu scored again on another free kick as he took the shot from the right side outside of the penalty area. He placed it over the wall. At minute 78, a pass went to USA’s Kljestan from the left wing. There was a breach in the defensive wall, giving Kljestan a clear shot at the Canadian goal as he stood near its center at about the penalty spot. He put the ball near the inside left post making the score 3-0.
Finally in the second half, yellow cards were issued, but at this time the referee’s authority was not respected.
Analysis
I was glad to finally see a USA game or team that did not disappoint me. Too frequently, I had observed long ball soccer, sloppy passing and trapping, and excessive roughness. This roughness seems to come from the grass roots of USA soccer as it is often passed on by our experiences with American football. I observed this roughness first hand with my earlier soccer experiences: Often I had to instruct foreign born players with my shoulder-charging drill in order for them to effectively deal with such roughness coming from competing American teams. While the American roughness still shows through, skillful playing seems to have caught on—at least with this team. These displayed skills will be necessary for the USA to effectively compete in the 2010 Olympics. I give my complements to the USA coaches and manager, but caution them that excessive roughness can cause players to be ejected, producing an obvious disadvantage.
One more note on the USA team. Continual pressurization of their opponents indicates that they are in top physical form from their training and conditioning. This too is an important ingredient for high competitive matches.
I cannot condone liberal referees. Their job is to enforce the FIFA Laws of the Game (Note: it is necessary to scroll down when reaching this web site).
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
On March 20, 3008, USA beat Canada in Nashville TN 3 to 0. The USA dominated the field in this game with short, low-ball passing and aggressiveness to win the loose ball. Sometimes though, they were too aggressive as is often the case with American style soccer. One such extreme example of this was when USA’s Altidore’s inexcusable collision with Canada’s goalkeeper Wagner. It was followed by a shove to the goalkeeper. What was the referee thinking when he did not issue red card or even yellow card Altidore? With this said, this win means that USA will go on to play in the 2010 Olympics.
Canada on the other hand, had difficulty getting past the midfield and often backed off by not pressurizing their opponents. At times however Canada had a few good attacks and won the loose ball with good shoulder-charging but could not score. Several of their shots were in haste and went extremely high. Thus, the USA goalkeeper Chris Seitz was hardly tested during this game.
The scoring went like this. At minute 26, USA's Freddy Adu scored on a free kick from the right side about 5 yards from the penalty area. He curved the ball around a 2 man wall (a 3 or 4 man wall might have prevented the goal). The ball deflected off the right hand of Canada’s goalkeeper Wagner and went into the left-hand corner.
At approximately 3 minutes into the second half, USA’s Adu scored again on another free kick as he took the shot from the right side outside of the penalty area. He placed it over the wall. At minute 78, a pass went to USA’s Kljestan from the left wing. There was a breach in the defensive wall, giving Kljestan a clear shot at the Canadian goal as he stood near its center at about the penalty spot. He put the ball near the inside left post making the score 3-0.
Finally in the second half, yellow cards were issued, but at this time the referee’s authority was not respected.
Analysis
I was glad to finally see a USA game or team that did not disappoint me. Too frequently, I had observed long ball soccer, sloppy passing and trapping, and excessive roughness. This roughness seems to come from the grass roots of USA soccer as it is often passed on by our experiences with American football. I observed this roughness first hand with my earlier soccer experiences: Often I had to instruct foreign born players with my shoulder-charging drill in order for them to effectively deal with such roughness coming from competing American teams. While the American roughness still shows through, skillful playing seems to have caught on—at least with this team. These displayed skills will be necessary for the USA to effectively compete in the 2010 Olympics. I give my complements to the USA coaches and manager, but caution them that excessive roughness can cause players to be ejected, producing an obvious disadvantage.
One more note on the USA team. Continual pressurization of their opponents indicates that they are in top physical form from their training and conditioning. This too is an important ingredient for high competitive matches.
I cannot condone liberal referees. Their job is to enforce the FIFA Laws of the Game (Note: it is necessary to scroll down when reaching this web site).
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
No. 29--Soccer: Manchester United vs. New Castle United Soccer: Six Goals For Manchester in the Second Half
by Soccer Coach Albert M. Luongo
The match took place on January 12, 2008. The score was Manchester United 6, New Castle United 0. All 6 goals were scored in the second half. Manchester totally dominated New Castle United except for a few short periods in each half.
Manchester United’s playing was well executed and it appeared to me that the team was well coached in passing techniques and driven hard by its endurance training. Their ball shielding was also superb. New Castle’s playing appeared to be just the opposite where the passing (except for only a few brief periods) was lacking along with their stamina. While they held up during the first half, they only had two shots on goal, Manchester had 10. Several of which were by Wayne Rooney: Several of his shots were on the mark, but most were stopped by New Castle’s goalkeeper. One could say that Rooney had an unlucky game that day.
The scoring for Manchester United (second half) went like this. At 49 minutes, Cristiano Ronaldo scored on a free kick just outside the penalty area. He kicked the ball at the wall and it went under the feet of New Castles’s players. For some reason the defenders in the wall jumped up and the ball went under their feet directly into the goal. At 54 minutes, the ball was fed back to Tevez during a defensive confusion of New Castle giving him a clear shot. Ronaldo at minute 69 received a pass and had an unopposed shot on goal. At the 85th minute Ferdinand was unmarked as he received a pass at the right wing and scored. At the 87th minute Ronaldo scored his 3rd goal and at the 90th minute Tevez scored his second goal by hitting the cross bar and the ball shot down to just barely cross the goal line.
Two yellow cards were given and a red card was issued to New Castle’s A. Smith at the 93rd minute. The referee was lenient on many fouls and fortunately it was a relatively clean game, making it a nice game to watch.
Summary of Important Information Necessary for Young Players and Coaches
Obviously with the score being 6-0, Manchester United’s playing skills were far superior to that of New Castle. Manchester United made few mistakes to speak of and their endurance was high as proven by the fact that they scored the last 3 goals in the last 6 minutes. This would indicate that their opponents could not keep up with them as well along with seeing their defenses break down. While I am speculating on Manchester’s endurance training, the results of the last 3 or 5 goals do indicate that strenuous endurance training must have been a factor for developing such a top soccer team. It takes a high amount of energy by players to continue to play where they make few passing errors as well as the way they demonstrated such great ball shielding .
It should be pointed out that when defending on a direct or indirect kick, it is not a good idea to jump up unless the kicked ball is high. I.e. remaining stationary is the best defense. Jumping up defeats the wall’s purpose. I say this even though my opinion is that a wall in front of the goal should not be permitted in soccer. Allowing a wall gives the defending team a good reason to take down an opponent who may be dangerously close to scoring. Disallowing walls would bring up the number of goals scored and who wouldn’t like that. It might even reduce the number of fouls.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
The match took place on January 12, 2008. The score was Manchester United 6, New Castle United 0. All 6 goals were scored in the second half. Manchester totally dominated New Castle United except for a few short periods in each half.
Manchester United’s playing was well executed and it appeared to me that the team was well coached in passing techniques and driven hard by its endurance training. Their ball shielding was also superb. New Castle’s playing appeared to be just the opposite where the passing (except for only a few brief periods) was lacking along with their stamina. While they held up during the first half, they only had two shots on goal, Manchester had 10. Several of which were by Wayne Rooney: Several of his shots were on the mark, but most were stopped by New Castle’s goalkeeper. One could say that Rooney had an unlucky game that day.
The scoring for Manchester United (second half) went like this. At 49 minutes, Cristiano Ronaldo scored on a free kick just outside the penalty area. He kicked the ball at the wall and it went under the feet of New Castles’s players. For some reason the defenders in the wall jumped up and the ball went under their feet directly into the goal. At 54 minutes, the ball was fed back to Tevez during a defensive confusion of New Castle giving him a clear shot. Ronaldo at minute 69 received a pass and had an unopposed shot on goal. At the 85th minute Ferdinand was unmarked as he received a pass at the right wing and scored. At the 87th minute Ronaldo scored his 3rd goal and at the 90th minute Tevez scored his second goal by hitting the cross bar and the ball shot down to just barely cross the goal line.
Two yellow cards were given and a red card was issued to New Castle’s A. Smith at the 93rd minute. The referee was lenient on many fouls and fortunately it was a relatively clean game, making it a nice game to watch.
Summary of Important Information Necessary for Young Players and Coaches
Obviously with the score being 6-0, Manchester United’s playing skills were far superior to that of New Castle. Manchester United made few mistakes to speak of and their endurance was high as proven by the fact that they scored the last 3 goals in the last 6 minutes. This would indicate that their opponents could not keep up with them as well along with seeing their defenses break down. While I am speculating on Manchester’s endurance training, the results of the last 3 or 5 goals do indicate that strenuous endurance training must have been a factor for developing such a top soccer team. It takes a high amount of energy by players to continue to play where they make few passing errors as well as the way they demonstrated such great ball shielding .
It should be pointed out that when defending on a direct or indirect kick, it is not a good idea to jump up unless the kicked ball is high. I.e. remaining stationary is the best defense. Jumping up defeats the wall’s purpose. I say this even though my opinion is that a wall in front of the goal should not be permitted in soccer. Allowing a wall gives the defending team a good reason to take down an opponent who may be dangerously close to scoring. Disallowing walls would bring up the number of goals scored and who wouldn’t like that. It might even reduce the number of fouls.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Wednesday, March 19, 2008
No. 28--Soccer: Real Madrid vs. Zaragoza—Spanish Soccer: Mistakes made by Both Teams
By Soccer Coach Albert M. Luongo
The game was played between Real Madrid and Real Zaragoza on January 6, 2008 with final score Real Madrid 2, Zaragoza 0. There were many tactical errors that in my opinion, should have been far less for teams in the Primera Liga
1. Goalkeeping. While Zaragoza had many shots on goal during the entire game, Real Madrid’s goalkeeper Castillas managed to stop each one of them. The same situation held true for Zaragoza’s goalkeeper Vallejo, but two balls got past him. Not being able to count on their defenders to screen shots on goal required both goalkeepers to be quite effective and at times flamboyant. However, with these great saves come risks. The risks come about when not mustering defenders to protect the goal--sooner or later the ball will go into the back of the net, even though this did not happen that day for Real Madrid. Near the end of the match, I must say however, that Real Madrid’s midfield players helped Castillas in the defense around the goal.
Other errors.
2. At least 4 kicked shots on goal in the first half were shots to the moon such as at the 36 minute mark by Zaragoza’s Celades and another at 39 minutes by another team member. For Real Madrid, Marcelo’s shots at 29 and 44 minutes were high over the goal. There were also others during this match.
3. The passes from both sides often were in error as the ball was intercepted quite frequently.
4. Many passes were long and in the air that contributed to the interceptions.
5. Dribbling into opponents directly and losing the ball is inexcusable.
6. Zaragoza seemed to slow down in the last half indicating that their stamina was less than desired for their players to be competitive.
7. The game became quite rough during the second half, while the referee overlooked some fouls quite often.
The goals for Real Madrid were scored by Ruud Van Nistelrooy’s header from a nice cross by Robinho at 65 minutes with no chance for the goalkeeper to save this shot. The other goal came from Robinho (by himself) at the 76th minute. His speed enabled him to dribble the ball unimpeded towards the goal while two of Zaragoza’s defenders gave chase.
Advice to young players and coaches
1. Goalkeepers must take command of their defense. They should call back players to defend the goal and instruct them where to play during attacks.
2. Shots on goal: One of the easiest things to do when attempting to score under pressure is to kick the ball very high over the goal. This error can be lessened if getting over the ball prior to the kick is practiced beforehand.
3. Care in passing should take place and not done in a panic. If necessary, turn around and shield the ball while looking for an open player. Passes should not be to players that are closely marked. This does not apply for crosses.
4. Passes should be on the ground whenever possible and to open players.
5. Shielding the ball instead of trying to dribble through defending opponents is preferred.
6. Endurance training is a must before and during soccer training.
7. Kicking-fouls and other violent fouls can cause ejection from the game thus reducing your team’s chances from winning. Make tackles directly to the ball and not to the legs.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
The game was played between Real Madrid and Real Zaragoza on January 6, 2008 with final score Real Madrid 2, Zaragoza 0. There were many tactical errors that in my opinion, should have been far less for teams in the Primera Liga
1. Goalkeeping. While Zaragoza had many shots on goal during the entire game, Real Madrid’s goalkeeper Castillas managed to stop each one of them. The same situation held true for Zaragoza’s goalkeeper Vallejo, but two balls got past him. Not being able to count on their defenders to screen shots on goal required both goalkeepers to be quite effective and at times flamboyant. However, with these great saves come risks. The risks come about when not mustering defenders to protect the goal--sooner or later the ball will go into the back of the net, even though this did not happen that day for Real Madrid. Near the end of the match, I must say however, that Real Madrid’s midfield players helped Castillas in the defense around the goal.
Other errors.
2. At least 4 kicked shots on goal in the first half were shots to the moon such as at the 36 minute mark by Zaragoza’s Celades and another at 39 minutes by another team member. For Real Madrid, Marcelo’s shots at 29 and 44 minutes were high over the goal. There were also others during this match.
3. The passes from both sides often were in error as the ball was intercepted quite frequently.
4. Many passes were long and in the air that contributed to the interceptions.
5. Dribbling into opponents directly and losing the ball is inexcusable.
6. Zaragoza seemed to slow down in the last half indicating that their stamina was less than desired for their players to be competitive.
7. The game became quite rough during the second half, while the referee overlooked some fouls quite often.
The goals for Real Madrid were scored by Ruud Van Nistelrooy’s header from a nice cross by Robinho at 65 minutes with no chance for the goalkeeper to save this shot. The other goal came from Robinho (by himself) at the 76th minute. His speed enabled him to dribble the ball unimpeded towards the goal while two of Zaragoza’s defenders gave chase.
Advice to young players and coaches
1. Goalkeepers must take command of their defense. They should call back players to defend the goal and instruct them where to play during attacks.
2. Shots on goal: One of the easiest things to do when attempting to score under pressure is to kick the ball very high over the goal. This error can be lessened if getting over the ball prior to the kick is practiced beforehand.
3. Care in passing should take place and not done in a panic. If necessary, turn around and shield the ball while looking for an open player. Passes should not be to players that are closely marked. This does not apply for crosses.
4. Passes should be on the ground whenever possible and to open players.
5. Shielding the ball instead of trying to dribble through defending opponents is preferred.
6. Endurance training is a must before and during soccer training.
7. Kicking-fouls and other violent fouls can cause ejection from the game thus reducing your team’s chances from winning. Make tackles directly to the ball and not to the legs.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
No.33—South American Soccer, Argentina: Boca Juniors vs. River Plate—A game Without Finesse
by Soccer Coach Albert M. Luongo
The game was played on January 26, 2008. I expected it to be a game of super quality since it was a match between two Argentine top teams: Argentina being one of the world’s top produces world-class players. However I was quite disappointed as these two super rivals battled it out on the soccer field. Only three yellow cards were issued in the first half—far too little in my opinion. The final score was Boca Juniors 2 and River Plate 0. I did not enjoy the match.
It was a war for the most part. The weapons used were tripping and kicking the legs. And, it was a poor passing game with lots of long balls sent up field with no particular player intended for receiving the ball. The game’s first quarter was dominated mostly by River Plate, but soon afterwards, they seemed to lose their edge.
What I also could not understand, even though it is a minor point, is that both goalkeepers were allowed to wear dark uniforms very similar in color to that of Boca’s uniform. I suspect that the shades may have been slightly different, but it was not by much.
Anyway, the game went like this. Boca’s Sebastian Battaglia scored at 19 minutes into the match. There was no defender in front of the net as he stood about 30 yards out from the center of the goal. He kicked a hard side volley from this distance and scored the only goal in the first half.
The game in the second half was mostly dominated by Boca as they were everywhere the ball went. Their energy never seemed to cease; but River’s team seemed to feel their energy leave them. They had much difficulty getting beyond the midfield resulting in mistakes such as trapping and passing errors, and kicking long balls upfield.
At 55 minutes into the game, River Plate’s Ortega got an elbow on the jaw and was subsequently tripped and or pushed, but no yellow card was issued to the offender. At the 57th minute, Boca’s Juan Riquelme kicked the ball to River’s goalkeeper who flat-handed the ball sending it straight up in the air. Boca's Martin Palermo then headed the ball into the back of the net as it descended while holding onto the crossbar with one hand. This goal was caused by a goalkeeper error using his hands the wrong way. At the 58th minute, the 6th yellow card was issued.
Analysis:
The game reminded me of a highly competitive high school game, but at 1.5 times the speed. By that I mean the players made many mistakes by doing plenty of high speed running and kicking long balls, but often not with skillful efficiency. However, in Boca Junior’s favor was their apparent top physical conditioning. This allowed them to maintain a highly energetic pace until the end of the match.
In general, the less than skillful play by these two teams does not reach the standards set by top South American or European teams. I suspect that the impassioned rivalry of both teams’ fans have instilled the need for aggressive play over skillful play.
Also, the refereeing was lacking by allowing both teams to constantly go for the legs of players rather than the ball. The referee clearly should have intervened earlier in the game to curb some of the dirty play. The FIFA Laws of the Game (initially scrolling down is necessary at this web site) are designed to protect the players from violent behavior. The referees are paid to enforce these laws.
I like to see goals scored as much as any soccer fan, but is it just me that dislikes the sound of the announcer’s "gooooooool"? I think that we all know that a goal was scored.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
The game was played on January 26, 2008. I expected it to be a game of super quality since it was a match between two Argentine top teams: Argentina being one of the world’s top produces world-class players. However I was quite disappointed as these two super rivals battled it out on the soccer field. Only three yellow cards were issued in the first half—far too little in my opinion. The final score was Boca Juniors 2 and River Plate 0. I did not enjoy the match.
It was a war for the most part. The weapons used were tripping and kicking the legs. And, it was a poor passing game with lots of long balls sent up field with no particular player intended for receiving the ball. The game’s first quarter was dominated mostly by River Plate, but soon afterwards, they seemed to lose their edge.
What I also could not understand, even though it is a minor point, is that both goalkeepers were allowed to wear dark uniforms very similar in color to that of Boca’s uniform. I suspect that the shades may have been slightly different, but it was not by much.
Anyway, the game went like this. Boca’s Sebastian Battaglia scored at 19 minutes into the match. There was no defender in front of the net as he stood about 30 yards out from the center of the goal. He kicked a hard side volley from this distance and scored the only goal in the first half.
The game in the second half was mostly dominated by Boca as they were everywhere the ball went. Their energy never seemed to cease; but River’s team seemed to feel their energy leave them. They had much difficulty getting beyond the midfield resulting in mistakes such as trapping and passing errors, and kicking long balls upfield.
At 55 minutes into the game, River Plate’s Ortega got an elbow on the jaw and was subsequently tripped and or pushed, but no yellow card was issued to the offender. At the 57th minute, Boca’s Juan Riquelme kicked the ball to River’s goalkeeper who flat-handed the ball sending it straight up in the air. Boca's Martin Palermo then headed the ball into the back of the net as it descended while holding onto the crossbar with one hand. This goal was caused by a goalkeeper error using his hands the wrong way. At the 58th minute, the 6th yellow card was issued.
Analysis:
The game reminded me of a highly competitive high school game, but at 1.5 times the speed. By that I mean the players made many mistakes by doing plenty of high speed running and kicking long balls, but often not with skillful efficiency. However, in Boca Junior’s favor was their apparent top physical conditioning. This allowed them to maintain a highly energetic pace until the end of the match.
In general, the less than skillful play by these two teams does not reach the standards set by top South American or European teams. I suspect that the impassioned rivalry of both teams’ fans have instilled the need for aggressive play over skillful play.
Also, the refereeing was lacking by allowing both teams to constantly go for the legs of players rather than the ball. The referee clearly should have intervened earlier in the game to curb some of the dirty play. The FIFA Laws of the Game (initially scrolling down is necessary at this web site) are designed to protect the players from violent behavior. The referees are paid to enforce these laws.
I like to see goals scored as much as any soccer fan, but is it just me that dislikes the sound of the announcer’s "gooooooool"? I think that we all know that a goal was scored.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
No. 27—Italian Soccer: Milan vs. Catania--Attack Soccer vs. Defense Soccer vs. Again
by Soccer Coach Albert M. Luongo
This match was aired on January 4, 2008 and ended with the score Catania 2, Milan 1. This was another observation for analyzing attack soccer vs. defense soccer. Most of this game was played with Milan on the attack taking many shots on goal while Catania played with a strong defense shored up by midfielders. Catania, however did make at least one defensive mistake that cost them a goal.
While Catania employed a strong defense, they took advantage of the few times that they had to score. In the 19th minute, Spinesi dribbled the ball up to the goal with no defenders except the goalkeeper opposing him. He then easily scored. Their second goal came at the 26-minute mark when Giuseppe Mascara took a long shot just outside of the penalty area. He was off to the right side of the goal, and scored. Only one nearby defender, just sort of in front of him, allowed him a clear shot. Furthermore, there were only three defenders in the area at the time, not enough to adequately protect it. However, Mascara's goal, although unimpeded, was a beautiful shot due to the accuracy needed from that distance to bypass the Milan goalkeeper.
During the 58th minute, Milan’s Palaschi fought off defenders with his hands (they were grabbing him) as he dribbled the ball toward the goal. He found a hole in the defense and scored; showing great concentration. A little later, about the 72rd minute, Catania did the smart thing and substituted in a defender Sabato. At about the 74th minute, Milan’s Gennaro Sardo kicked Catania’s Serginho and was shown the red card. At this point, with only ten players on the field it became much harder for Milan to catch up with Catania, which of course they never did.
Discussion
1. As I always point out, defense soccer is the way to run a soccer team. Most of the time when Milan was attacking, Catania had at least seven players surrounding the defensive area. In contrast, Milan generally employed only three defense players as the midfielders only infrequently dropped back to help out on defense.
2. Why do some players do stupid things like adding an extra kick after the initial foul? Following this incident, a game with relatively few violent fouls became rough. A player getting ejected seriously compromises one’s team and frequently contributes to losing the match, or in this case, reducing the team’s chances of catching up with the opponents. There were approximately 17 fouls in the first half, but at least they were not violent making the game reasonably pleasant to watch.
3. One positive aspect that I would like to point out is the great shielding of the ball by both teams. The Italians like some South American teams do this very well.
4. Not discussed above are panic shots on goal. They take place in almost every game. What I find hard to understand, especially at the professional level, are shots that seem to be aimed at the sun or moon instead of the goal. Players at this level should know enough to practice getting over the ball before making the kick--getting over the ball tends to keep it from rising too high.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Wednesday, March 5, 2008
No. 26—Spanish Soccer: Barcelona vs. Real Madrid—Comments About Attack Soccer vs. Defense Soccer
By Soccer Coach Albert M. Luongo
Throughout most of the game, with possibly the last half of the second half on December 28, 2007, Barcelona dominated the field with control of the ball and good passing. This style of play is commended, but they lost anyway. The final score of the Match was Madrid 1, Barcelona 0.Real Madrid’s Julio Baptista scored the only goal at minute 35. He received a great pass from teammate Ruud Van Nistelrooy, controlled the pass while running and kicked a hard shot from the goal’s left side into the upper right corner. Barcelona’s goalkeeper Victor Valdes had no chance to save the shot.
This appeared to me as a game between an attacking team--Barcelona opposing Real Madrid, a team shored up by a strong defens. Barcelona had many attacks on goal and chances to score while Real Madrid had relatively few. The difference is that Real Madrid usually had a wall of 7 defensive players spread across the goalmouth forming a strong impedance against attacks. Furthermore, these defensive players did not appear to be chasing opposing attackers dribbling the ball, at any time in the game. Defenders chasing opponents is a sure sign that defensive players are out of position. This was not the case with Barcelona’s defense: The goal scored by Real Madrid’s Baptista was with a clear shot with no opposition from Barcelona except by two defenders chasing him. And Barcelona typically had few, if any, midfielders back at the goal area during dynamic play, i.e., not counting corner kicks and free kicks.
Here is a little added note about a few players: For Real Madrid, one such defender for his defensive role should be commended. He is Sergio Ramos. And for Barcelona, a key playmaker for their attacks is Lionel Messi. Unfortunately for Barcelona, he was absent during this game due to an injury. Messi along with Ronaldinho are quite a powerful combination on the front line.
Which style of soccer do I favor?
Defense, of course. While I was coaching I learned to win championships by thinking first of defense then and only then about offense. After many years of coaching (and playing) I learned that if the defense were in proper order, somehow the offensive players would do their job.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Throughout most of the game, with possibly the last half of the second half on December 28, 2007, Barcelona dominated the field with control of the ball and good passing. This style of play is commended, but they lost anyway. The final score of the Match was Madrid 1, Barcelona 0.Real Madrid’s Julio Baptista scored the only goal at minute 35. He received a great pass from teammate Ruud Van Nistelrooy, controlled the pass while running and kicked a hard shot from the goal’s left side into the upper right corner. Barcelona’s goalkeeper Victor Valdes had no chance to save the shot.
This appeared to me as a game between an attacking team--Barcelona opposing Real Madrid, a team shored up by a strong defens. Barcelona had many attacks on goal and chances to score while Real Madrid had relatively few. The difference is that Real Madrid usually had a wall of 7 defensive players spread across the goalmouth forming a strong impedance against attacks. Furthermore, these defensive players did not appear to be chasing opposing attackers dribbling the ball, at any time in the game. Defenders chasing opponents is a sure sign that defensive players are out of position. This was not the case with Barcelona’s defense: The goal scored by Real Madrid’s Baptista was with a clear shot with no opposition from Barcelona except by two defenders chasing him. And Barcelona typically had few, if any, midfielders back at the goal area during dynamic play, i.e., not counting corner kicks and free kicks.
Here is a little added note about a few players: For Real Madrid, one such defender for his defensive role should be commended. He is Sergio Ramos. And for Barcelona, a key playmaker for their attacks is Lionel Messi. Unfortunately for Barcelona, he was absent during this game due to an injury. Messi along with Ronaldinho are quite a powerful combination on the front line.
Which style of soccer do I favor?
Defense, of course. While I was coaching I learned to win championships by thinking first of defense then and only then about offense. After many years of coaching (and playing) I learned that if the defense were in proper order, somehow the offensive players would do their job.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Saturday, March 1, 2008
No. 25—Atletico Madrid vs. Espanyol Soccer (Football) from Spain: Was this a Soccer Game or Karate?
by Soccer Coach Albert M. Luongo
Espanyol beat Atletico Madrid 2-1 on December 24, 2007. In my opinion the game was played like a hockey match—playing the player, not the ball. This type of dirty playing took place during the first half and partly into the second half. The contest started out with two fouls in the first minute: Normally, experience tells me not to watch a soccer game when it starts out this way; but I decided to do something that I never do. I decided to watch the match and count fouls and balls sent over the touchline. The ball went out of the touch line 6 times in the first 12 minutes and went over the two touchlines a total of 29 times during the match--not as frequently as I had predicted, but still not good. The first half was brutal, as there were 31 takedowns (kicking out the legs) that I counted. The referee did not call several of the fouls or issue several yellow cards that I believe were warranted. Finally on minute 21 a red card was given to Atletico’s Aquero who either slapped or punched an opponent—it was difficult to determine which it was. Even the announcer mentioned that the referee was losing control of the game. Furthermore, on the 28th minute a handball in the penalty area was not called. On the 30th minute there should have been given another red card.
The fouls continued in the second half but the rate was less as I only counted 14 takedowns; however, Athletico’s Penia was given the 2nd red card of the game in the 54th minute of play. This ejection, of course, meant that they would only field 9 players for the rest of the game.
Aside from the violence taking place, there were some good events to point out. Starting with the goals, Atletico’s Simao curved a free kick (awarded for a penalty or course) just to the inside of the right post. Espanyol’s goalkeeper Kameni had no chance to stop this first goal of the game at about minute 36. On the 53rd minute, Espanyol’s Tamudo headed in a quick ball with no chance for the defense or Atletico’s goalkeeper Abbiati to prevent the goal. At minute 85, De la Pena (pronounced Day-la Penya) sent a fast ball to teammate Luis Garcia to once again beat the Atletico goal keeper Abbiati—he had no chance to stop this one either. Some of the best ball shielding came from the Atletico Madrid’s team and they played their hearts out after being down by 2 players. They played a defensive game, especially after being down by losing their first player and most of the team helped out in defense, making penetration difficult. After losing their 2nd player, they could not launch many attacks on goal as the team had to run the whole field to attack their opponent’s goal. But their defense was commendable as Espanyol had many attacks on goal in the latter part of the 2nd half, but with out success until the goal by De la Pena/Garcia: Statistically it was bound to come.
Discussion on Referees.
First of all, I wish to note that I do not mention referees’ names in order to protect them. I do not wish to expose them to any harm. Furthermore, I believe that their names should always be withheld from the public for the same reason. However, soccer (or football) leagues should insist on only using the referees that are firm with offending players. When I refereed soccer (football) matches, I sized up violent players and teams right at the start of the match. In order to be correct and keep each match a clean one, I made sure that I clearly understood and enforced the FIFA Laws of the Game--(Note: at this web site it is necessary to scroll down to see the laws). Thus I exercised my authority immediately when violent fouls (and other fouls) took place, knowing what was coming if I did not do so. That way, there was no doubt in anyone’s mind as to who was in charge. That is the way it is supposed to be! To overlook serious fouls in the beginning sets up a precedent and thus the violent players or teams immediately size up the referee. But when the players realize that the referee stands for no nonsense, they normally back away from playing the player and play the ball. After all, the Laws of the Game have been developed to protect the players and there should be no excuse for those referees that lenient on offenders.
Discussion on Skill vs. Dirty Tactics.
Soccer players should take note of this. Skillful players and teams go on to climb higher in their league. Dirty playing will never be a substitute the proper skills necessary to be recognized by coaches of higher level teams. Proper skills take time and devotion to learn them. Atletico Madrid have the skills to have held Espanyol at bay by keeping them from scoring the winning goal until the last few minutes of the match. If they would have been able to play with 11 players for the duration of the match, the results could have been different. But, due to receiving red cards, the 9 remaining players were enervated (lost their energy) and could no longer sustain good passing attacks. Yet they almost held their opponents to tie game by a super defense. Had they had all 11 players, playing as hard as they played in the latter part of the game, they may have even won the contest.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Espanyol beat Atletico Madrid 2-1 on December 24, 2007. In my opinion the game was played like a hockey match—playing the player, not the ball. This type of dirty playing took place during the first half and partly into the second half. The contest started out with two fouls in the first minute: Normally, experience tells me not to watch a soccer game when it starts out this way; but I decided to do something that I never do. I decided to watch the match and count fouls and balls sent over the touchline. The ball went out of the touch line 6 times in the first 12 minutes and went over the two touchlines a total of 29 times during the match--not as frequently as I had predicted, but still not good. The first half was brutal, as there were 31 takedowns (kicking out the legs) that I counted. The referee did not call several of the fouls or issue several yellow cards that I believe were warranted. Finally on minute 21 a red card was given to Atletico’s Aquero who either slapped or punched an opponent—it was difficult to determine which it was. Even the announcer mentioned that the referee was losing control of the game. Furthermore, on the 28th minute a handball in the penalty area was not called. On the 30th minute there should have been given another red card.
The fouls continued in the second half but the rate was less as I only counted 14 takedowns; however, Athletico’s Penia was given the 2nd red card of the game in the 54th minute of play. This ejection, of course, meant that they would only field 9 players for the rest of the game.
Aside from the violence taking place, there were some good events to point out. Starting with the goals, Atletico’s Simao curved a free kick (awarded for a penalty or course) just to the inside of the right post. Espanyol’s goalkeeper Kameni had no chance to stop this first goal of the game at about minute 36. On the 53rd minute, Espanyol’s Tamudo headed in a quick ball with no chance for the defense or Atletico’s goalkeeper Abbiati to prevent the goal. At minute 85, De la Pena (pronounced Day-la Penya) sent a fast ball to teammate Luis Garcia to once again beat the Atletico goal keeper Abbiati—he had no chance to stop this one either. Some of the best ball shielding came from the Atletico Madrid’s team and they played their hearts out after being down by 2 players. They played a defensive game, especially after being down by losing their first player and most of the team helped out in defense, making penetration difficult. After losing their 2nd player, they could not launch many attacks on goal as the team had to run the whole field to attack their opponent’s goal. But their defense was commendable as Espanyol had many attacks on goal in the latter part of the 2nd half, but with out success until the goal by De la Pena/Garcia: Statistically it was bound to come.
Discussion on Referees.
First of all, I wish to note that I do not mention referees’ names in order to protect them. I do not wish to expose them to any harm. Furthermore, I believe that their names should always be withheld from the public for the same reason. However, soccer (or football) leagues should insist on only using the referees that are firm with offending players. When I refereed soccer (football) matches, I sized up violent players and teams right at the start of the match. In order to be correct and keep each match a clean one, I made sure that I clearly understood and enforced the FIFA Laws of the Game--(Note: at this web site it is necessary to scroll down to see the laws). Thus I exercised my authority immediately when violent fouls (and other fouls) took place, knowing what was coming if I did not do so. That way, there was no doubt in anyone’s mind as to who was in charge. That is the way it is supposed to be! To overlook serious fouls in the beginning sets up a precedent and thus the violent players or teams immediately size up the referee. But when the players realize that the referee stands for no nonsense, they normally back away from playing the player and play the ball. After all, the Laws of the Game have been developed to protect the players and there should be no excuse for those referees that lenient on offenders.
Discussion on Skill vs. Dirty Tactics.
Soccer players should take note of this. Skillful players and teams go on to climb higher in their league. Dirty playing will never be a substitute the proper skills necessary to be recognized by coaches of higher level teams. Proper skills take time and devotion to learn them. Atletico Madrid have the skills to have held Espanyol at bay by keeping them from scoring the winning goal until the last few minutes of the match. If they would have been able to play with 11 players for the duration of the match, the results could have been different. But, due to receiving red cards, the 9 remaining players were enervated (lost their energy) and could no longer sustain good passing attacks. Yet they almost held their opponents to tie game by a super defense. Had they had all 11 players, playing as hard as they played in the latter part of the game, they may have even won the contest.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Tuesday, February 26, 2008
No. 24—Barcelona vs. Real Madrid Soccer from Spain: Real Madrid’s Error in Judgement May be the Reason for Not Winning the Match
by Soccer Coach Albert M.Luongo
The competition between the Barcelona and Real Madrid soccer teams proved to be an exciting game that was held on March 10, 2007: The match was replayed on TV on December 22, 2007. The final score ended in a tie of 3-3. In my opinion, it could have been a victory for Madrid, but this will be discussed later. Both teams were running at top speed through the entire game. However, as the game wore on, the play became rough, but for the most part at least, the referee maintained control. Within 4 minutes into the game, Real Madrid’s Van Nistelrooy scored by being in front of the goal with only the goalkeeper to his front. He again scored at the 12-minute time on a penalty kick. Two minutes before, at 10 minutes into the game, Barcelona’s Leo Messi scored with no defenseman on him. At minute 27, Barcelona’s Ronaldinho with a great run with the ball passed it to unmarked Messi for Messi’s 2nd goal. At the last minute into this half, Barcelona’s Pressas Olequer received a red card for an inexcusable foul causing the team to play with 10 players from there on. The score was 2-2 at the end of the first half.
Madrid’s coach Fabio Capello, I believe, was not satisfied with a 2-2 tie and brought in Striker Robinho after 15 minutes of play into the second half. At this point, I would have strengthened the defense and not brought in an attacker. I believe this was the error that prevented Real Madrid from winning the game. At about 73 minutes into the game, Real Madrid’s Sergio Ramos scored on a diving header on a free kick. It rebounded off the cross bar and into the goal making the score 3-2. At this point for sure, strengthening the defense would have been a prudent measure. Anyway, at the 90th minute, Ronaldinho passed the ball to Messi. Messi made one of his usually superb runs with the ball, passed through two defenders simultaneously--on the left attacking wing, and shot the ball into the net at the far post; thus, scoring all of Barcelona’s 3 goals. He is the team’s workhorse: This player wants the ball, no matter which team has it. So the game ended with a tie of 3-3 instead of 3-2 in favor with Real Madrid.
This is for young players and coaches to know:
I do not favor one team over the other and my views throughout the game are totally objective. This was a relatively high scoring game as both teams are rivals and it appeared that attack soccer would be the usual method in such a match. As with most if not all high-scoring games, the defensive players can prevent some of the goals; but not all. Perfect headers into the goal are of course the most difficult to prevent. But, marking an attacker in one’s zone (and not being mesmerized by the ball) and backing up with the dribbling attacker are the essential requirements for a superb defender. Naturally, self-discipline for not getting faked is another key ingredient into the mix. Real Madrid could have won. Not only did they have the lead over Barcelona up until the final minutes of the game, they had a one player advantage. Had they shored up their defense later in the match, they could possibly have prevented that last minute goal of Messi.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
The competition between the Barcelona and Real Madrid soccer teams proved to be an exciting game that was held on March 10, 2007: The match was replayed on TV on December 22, 2007. The final score ended in a tie of 3-3. In my opinion, it could have been a victory for Madrid, but this will be discussed later. Both teams were running at top speed through the entire game. However, as the game wore on, the play became rough, but for the most part at least, the referee maintained control. Within 4 minutes into the game, Real Madrid’s Van Nistelrooy scored by being in front of the goal with only the goalkeeper to his front. He again scored at the 12-minute time on a penalty kick. Two minutes before, at 10 minutes into the game, Barcelona’s Leo Messi scored with no defenseman on him. At minute 27, Barcelona’s Ronaldinho with a great run with the ball passed it to unmarked Messi for Messi’s 2nd goal. At the last minute into this half, Barcelona’s Pressas Olequer received a red card for an inexcusable foul causing the team to play with 10 players from there on. The score was 2-2 at the end of the first half.
Madrid’s coach Fabio Capello, I believe, was not satisfied with a 2-2 tie and brought in Striker Robinho after 15 minutes of play into the second half. At this point, I would have strengthened the defense and not brought in an attacker. I believe this was the error that prevented Real Madrid from winning the game. At about 73 minutes into the game, Real Madrid’s Sergio Ramos scored on a diving header on a free kick. It rebounded off the cross bar and into the goal making the score 3-2. At this point for sure, strengthening the defense would have been a prudent measure. Anyway, at the 90th minute, Ronaldinho passed the ball to Messi. Messi made one of his usually superb runs with the ball, passed through two defenders simultaneously--on the left attacking wing, and shot the ball into the net at the far post; thus, scoring all of Barcelona’s 3 goals. He is the team’s workhorse: This player wants the ball, no matter which team has it. So the game ended with a tie of 3-3 instead of 3-2 in favor with Real Madrid.
This is for young players and coaches to know:
I do not favor one team over the other and my views throughout the game are totally objective. This was a relatively high scoring game as both teams are rivals and it appeared that attack soccer would be the usual method in such a match. As with most if not all high-scoring games, the defensive players can prevent some of the goals; but not all. Perfect headers into the goal are of course the most difficult to prevent. But, marking an attacker in one’s zone (and not being mesmerized by the ball) and backing up with the dribbling attacker are the essential requirements for a superb defender. Naturally, self-discipline for not getting faked is another key ingredient into the mix. Real Madrid could have won. Not only did they have the lead over Barcelona up until the final minutes of the game, they had a one player advantage. Had they shored up their defense later in the match, they could possibly have prevented that last minute goal of Messi.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Monday, February 18, 2008
No. 23--Boca Juniors vs. AC Milan Argentine and Italian Soccer: An Example of Not Enough Defense
by Soccer Coach Albert M. Luongo
The FIFA Club World Cup final game was held in Japan between Boca Juniors vs. AC Milan on Dec. 16, 2007. It ended in a 4 to 2 victory for Milan, thus they won the cup. This was an exciting game to watch as it was played professionally at the highest level in my opinion. The game was played with passes on the ground most of the time—typical for Italian and Argentine teams. In addition there were very few goalie’s kicks far up field. And the ball seldom went out of play during the match. All of that made for a highly professional and enjoyable match.
The shooting and scoring went like this. At 21 minutes into the game Milan’s Kaka’ passed off the ball to Philippo Inzaghi who headed it into the goal. There was no chance for the defense to prevent this goal. About a minute later Boca’s Rodrigo Palacio also headed in a crossed ball with no chance for the Argentine defense to stop it. At 35 minutes into the game, Boca’s Placio placed the ball in front of the goal, but no attackers were there and they lost that chance to score. The score was 1 to 1 at the end of the first half.
The second half’s scoring went like this. At about the 49th minute, Milan’s Nesta placed a half volley into the goal and made it 2 to 1. At little while later, Kaka’ scored by himself with some fantastic dribbling making the score 3 to 1. At minute 71, Kaka’ again sent the ball to unmarked Inzaghi who kicked in the ball making the score 4 to 1.Inzaghi was completely unmarked. At the 84th minute a shot from Boca’s Ledesma kicked ball inadvertently ricocheted off the midsection of Milan’s defender and into the goal. This goal was attributed to Ambrosomi scoring against his own team making the score 4 to 2.
Near the 76th minute of play, two red cards were issued, within a few minitues of each other. One to Argentine’s the Ledesma and the other to the Italian’s Kaladze. The referee is commended for handing out these cards, as there is no excuse for their type of malicious fouls.
More about the game play. At 5 minutes into the match, Milan’s Seedoff sent a good ball across the goalmouth, but there was no one there. Thus Milan missed their first chance to score. However, the team’s players showed good dribbling and passing skills making it a possessive game for them. One problem with the Argentine team was that frequently they lacked enough players back for defense. It was quite the opposite with Milan. Often Milan had their whole midfield team back helping out the defense team. This had an obvious positive effect on the outcome of the game. In summing up the game, both teams gave their all, but I believe that Milan’s players were in the best of form with passing, defense and endurance.
A note to young players and coaches:
This was a championship game and as such the best teams participated in the match. To get there, it naturally takes talented players that play together as a team. But, it takes more than that. It takes a disciplined defense controlled by the goalkeeper to help prevent defensive mistakes. It also takes discipline to keep most passes on the ground to open players. Furthermore, physical endurance that comes from rigorous training at home and at practices is a must. A further note on defense: Defensive backs must learn to watch and mark unmarked opponents near their goal. Not doing so is a mistake often made both at the non-professional and professional levels. It is usually costly.
I personnally cannot fault Ambrosomi for scoring against his own team on defense. The same situation occurred with me on defense in a game several years ago. We lost that match because of my goal.
The FIFA Club World Cup final game was held in Japan between Boca Juniors vs. AC Milan on Dec. 16, 2007. It ended in a 4 to 2 victory for Milan, thus they won the cup. This was an exciting game to watch as it was played professionally at the highest level in my opinion. The game was played with passes on the ground most of the time—typical for Italian and Argentine teams. In addition there were very few goalie’s kicks far up field. And the ball seldom went out of play during the match. All of that made for a highly professional and enjoyable match.
The shooting and scoring went like this. At 21 minutes into the game Milan’s Kaka’ passed off the ball to Philippo Inzaghi who headed it into the goal. There was no chance for the defense to prevent this goal. About a minute later Boca’s Rodrigo Palacio also headed in a crossed ball with no chance for the Argentine defense to stop it. At 35 minutes into the game, Boca’s Placio placed the ball in front of the goal, but no attackers were there and they lost that chance to score. The score was 1 to 1 at the end of the first half.
The second half’s scoring went like this. At about the 49th minute, Milan’s Nesta placed a half volley into the goal and made it 2 to 1. At little while later, Kaka’ scored by himself with some fantastic dribbling making the score 3 to 1. At minute 71, Kaka’ again sent the ball to unmarked Inzaghi who kicked in the ball making the score 4 to 1.Inzaghi was completely unmarked. At the 84th minute a shot from Boca’s Ledesma kicked ball inadvertently ricocheted off the midsection of Milan’s defender and into the goal. This goal was attributed to Ambrosomi scoring against his own team making the score 4 to 2.
Near the 76th minute of play, two red cards were issued, within a few minitues of each other. One to Argentine’s the Ledesma and the other to the Italian’s Kaladze. The referee is commended for handing out these cards, as there is no excuse for their type of malicious fouls.
More about the game play. At 5 minutes into the match, Milan’s Seedoff sent a good ball across the goalmouth, but there was no one there. Thus Milan missed their first chance to score. However, the team’s players showed good dribbling and passing skills making it a possessive game for them. One problem with the Argentine team was that frequently they lacked enough players back for defense. It was quite the opposite with Milan. Often Milan had their whole midfield team back helping out the defense team. This had an obvious positive effect on the outcome of the game. In summing up the game, both teams gave their all, but I believe that Milan’s players were in the best of form with passing, defense and endurance.
A note to young players and coaches:
This was a championship game and as such the best teams participated in the match. To get there, it naturally takes talented players that play together as a team. But, it takes more than that. It takes a disciplined defense controlled by the goalkeeper to help prevent defensive mistakes. It also takes discipline to keep most passes on the ground to open players. Furthermore, physical endurance that comes from rigorous training at home and at practices is a must. A further note on defense: Defensive backs must learn to watch and mark unmarked opponents near their goal. Not doing so is a mistake often made both at the non-professional and professional levels. It is usually costly.
I personnally cannot fault Ambrosomi for scoring against his own team on defense. The same situation occurred with me on defense in a game several years ago. We lost that match because of my goal.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Thursday, February 14, 2008
No. 22--Hertha Berlin vs. FC Bayern Munich German Soccer: A Strong Defense by the Weaker Team Kept Them to from Losing
By Soccer Coach Albert M. Luongo
This game on Dec. 15, 2007 ended with no score for either team. FC Bayern Munich being the dominant team could not score against the less aggressive Hertha Berlin. How can a team that dominates the field for most of the game not fail to score against a weaker midfield team? The answer is almost always that a weaker team with a strong defense, making few defensive errors can prevent the opposition from scoring. While totally dominating the first half, Bayern Munich attempted to attack Hertha Berlin’s defense. However, Hertha Berlin’s defense team backed up with each dribbling player and generally did not attempt to tackle the ball while it was under control of the dribbler.That is excellent defense. They maintained themselves in front of their attackers and were careful not to fall for fake movements on the apart of their attackers. This excellent defense frustrated Bayern Munich.
Hertha Berlin’s management must have given its team a strong pep talk during the half time because this team reappeared on the field aggressively at the beginning of the second half. Up to the end of the first half, it seemed that it was just a matter of time before Bayern Munich would score as they had many attacking chances, even though Hertha Berlin’s defense thwarted them continuously. However after about 15 minutes into the half, Bayern Munich again dominated the field of play for most of the remaining game allowing only sporadic attacks by Berlin. Within a few minutes to the end of the game, Hertha Berlin’s defense was caught off guard however. Bayern’s Miroslav Klose was running at top speed towards the goal with two of Berlin’s defenders on his heels. Somehow the defense failed this time to be in front of their opposition attacker. This was a big mistake. Klose got of the shot but it went high off the mark. Berlin got off lucky.
FC Bayern’s passes were more accurate than those of Hertha’s. And they were more aggressive going for the loose ball. Also, it appeared that Bayern's team was in better endurance shape than that Hertha Berlin. With all of this dominance on the field, they could only produce a few crosses due to the opposition defensive pressure.
Many of Hertha Berlin’s passes were indiscriminate and therefore gave them only a few good chances to score, but their strong defense and excellent slide tackles kept them from losing the match. While their defense was adequate, the few chance to score by Hertha were mostly due to the defensive mistakes of FC Bayern Munich.
With both teams, most of the shots on goal were high and sailed over the goal. This is quite common in soccer even in with the most professional athletes. But at least each had a commendable defense.
Young players and coaches should take note of what went right and what went wrong in this game.
1. Rigorous conditioning and training of players gives them more speed and endurance throughout the game.
2. Endurance and accurate passing allows a team to dominate a game, if the other team is weaker in either or both of these two areas.
3. A strong defense making few defensive errors can prevent one's own team from losing a soccer match.
4. Kicks on goal must be taken with the body over the ball in order for the shots to not rise above the goal. This must be practiced frequently.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
This game on Dec. 15, 2007 ended with no score for either team. FC Bayern Munich being the dominant team could not score against the less aggressive Hertha Berlin. How can a team that dominates the field for most of the game not fail to score against a weaker midfield team? The answer is almost always that a weaker team with a strong defense, making few defensive errors can prevent the opposition from scoring. While totally dominating the first half, Bayern Munich attempted to attack Hertha Berlin’s defense. However, Hertha Berlin’s defense team backed up with each dribbling player and generally did not attempt to tackle the ball while it was under control of the dribbler.That is excellent defense. They maintained themselves in front of their attackers and were careful not to fall for fake movements on the apart of their attackers. This excellent defense frustrated Bayern Munich.
Hertha Berlin’s management must have given its team a strong pep talk during the half time because this team reappeared on the field aggressively at the beginning of the second half. Up to the end of the first half, it seemed that it was just a matter of time before Bayern Munich would score as they had many attacking chances, even though Hertha Berlin’s defense thwarted them continuously. However after about 15 minutes into the half, Bayern Munich again dominated the field of play for most of the remaining game allowing only sporadic attacks by Berlin. Within a few minutes to the end of the game, Hertha Berlin’s defense was caught off guard however. Bayern’s Miroslav Klose was running at top speed towards the goal with two of Berlin’s defenders on his heels. Somehow the defense failed this time to be in front of their opposition attacker. This was a big mistake. Klose got of the shot but it went high off the mark. Berlin got off lucky.
FC Bayern’s passes were more accurate than those of Hertha’s. And they were more aggressive going for the loose ball. Also, it appeared that Bayern's team was in better endurance shape than that Hertha Berlin. With all of this dominance on the field, they could only produce a few crosses due to the opposition defensive pressure.
Many of Hertha Berlin’s passes were indiscriminate and therefore gave them only a few good chances to score, but their strong defense and excellent slide tackles kept them from losing the match. While their defense was adequate, the few chance to score by Hertha were mostly due to the defensive mistakes of FC Bayern Munich.
With both teams, most of the shots on goal were high and sailed over the goal. This is quite common in soccer even in with the most professional athletes. But at least each had a commendable defense.
Young players and coaches should take note of what went right and what went wrong in this game.
1. Rigorous conditioning and training of players gives them more speed and endurance throughout the game.
2. Endurance and accurate passing allows a team to dominate a game, if the other team is weaker in either or both of these two areas.
3. A strong defense making few defensive errors can prevent one's own team from losing a soccer match.
4. Kicks on goal must be taken with the body over the ball in order for the shots to not rise above the goal. This must be practiced frequently.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Wednesday, February 6, 2008
No. 21--Ascoli vs. Fiorentina Italian Soccer: Great Defenses by Midfielders and the Defense
by Soccer Coach Al Luongo
This recent game aired on Dec. 11, 2007. It was full of action, was played during a pouring cold rain and ended in a 1 to 1 tie. At 30 minutes into the game a corner kick was put to the head of Fiorentina’s Per Kroldrup. He sent the ball swiftly into the back of the net. There was no chance for the defense to stop this shot. Fiorentina was the more aggressive as they pressured Ascoli for most of the early part of the game. However though, the game was played mostly in the midfield with Fiorentina having a few more chances at scoring than Ascoli. Both defenses were strong and for the most part disallowed each opposition from making many penetrations into the goal area. This action packed game was performed as both teams made good and bad passes in the midfield; thus keeping the ball mostly in this part of the field for the first 60 minutes. Up to this time, Fiorentina seemed to be more determined and had more control of the ball.
At times during the game, Ascoli seemed to back away and let Fiorentina players win the loose ball, thus giving their opposition more of a chance to make passing buildups for an attack on their own goal. And, it seemed that Fiorentina would easily win the match.
After about 60 minutes into the game, Ascoli seemed to get a burst of energy, became stronger and the game was more evenly matched. At about the 80th minute, Ascoli’s Stefano Guberti kicked a powerful shot with no chance for Fiorentina’s goalkeeper Chistiano Lupatelli. This brought the score to 1 to 1.
The last ten minutes of the game was largely kickball as each team tried to hurry the ball upfield in hopes of a forward player scoring.
An analysis of the game is as follows: The game ended in a low tie score due to the midfield players of both teams being very defensive (aggressive), along with the good defensive techniques of the defense teams. By being defensive, it is meant that the players pressured the opposition when they were without the ball. These aggressive defensive movements made it difficult for both teams to develop good attack buildups, so they were at a minimum. Young players should take note of the Following: It is a fact that being a good soccer midfielder or forward means that it is not only necessary to participate on the offense, but
1. To be undeterred to win the loose ball by soccer-legal means
2. And to pressurize the opponents to win the ball back.
One problem not mentioned above, was one in which the goalkeepers too often kicked the ball up field hoping that the forwards could make something of these long passes (kicks). Long upfield kicks are best kept to a minimum; as most knowledgeable soccer people know, there is somewhat of a 70% or better chance that the ball will be intercepted (note: the interception is only determined after the ball is finally settled).
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
This recent game aired on Dec. 11, 2007. It was full of action, was played during a pouring cold rain and ended in a 1 to 1 tie. At 30 minutes into the game a corner kick was put to the head of Fiorentina’s Per Kroldrup. He sent the ball swiftly into the back of the net. There was no chance for the defense to stop this shot. Fiorentina was the more aggressive as they pressured Ascoli for most of the early part of the game. However though, the game was played mostly in the midfield with Fiorentina having a few more chances at scoring than Ascoli. Both defenses were strong and for the most part disallowed each opposition from making many penetrations into the goal area. This action packed game was performed as both teams made good and bad passes in the midfield; thus keeping the ball mostly in this part of the field for the first 60 minutes. Up to this time, Fiorentina seemed to be more determined and had more control of the ball.
At times during the game, Ascoli seemed to back away and let Fiorentina players win the loose ball, thus giving their opposition more of a chance to make passing buildups for an attack on their own goal. And, it seemed that Fiorentina would easily win the match.
After about 60 minutes into the game, Ascoli seemed to get a burst of energy, became stronger and the game was more evenly matched. At about the 80th minute, Ascoli’s Stefano Guberti kicked a powerful shot with no chance for Fiorentina’s goalkeeper Chistiano Lupatelli. This brought the score to 1 to 1.
The last ten minutes of the game was largely kickball as each team tried to hurry the ball upfield in hopes of a forward player scoring.
An analysis of the game is as follows: The game ended in a low tie score due to the midfield players of both teams being very defensive (aggressive), along with the good defensive techniques of the defense teams. By being defensive, it is meant that the players pressured the opposition when they were without the ball. These aggressive defensive movements made it difficult for both teams to develop good attack buildups, so they were at a minimum. Young players should take note of the Following: It is a fact that being a good soccer midfielder or forward means that it is not only necessary to participate on the offense, but
1. To be undeterred to win the loose ball by soccer-legal means
2. And to pressurize the opponents to win the ball back.
One problem not mentioned above, was one in which the goalkeepers too often kicked the ball up field hoping that the forwards could make something of these long passes (kicks). Long upfield kicks are best kept to a minimum; as most knowledgeable soccer people know, there is somewhat of a 70% or better chance that the ball will be intercepted (note: the interception is only determined after the ball is finally settled).
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Thursday, January 31, 2008
No.8--Awareness of Important Factors for Soccer Coaches and Players--Fiorentina vs. Udinese & Women's Florida State Univ. Against North Carolina Univ.
by Soccer Coach Albert M. Luongo
I always stress that it is important with youth soccer training that skill development should come before winning games. However, since people are also naturally interested in winning games, both achievements must actually go hand in hand. But it must be remembered that in the long hall, skills are paramount for winning against competition. Let us then review some important skills that are a prerequisite for winning soccer games.
There are three important factors for winning against similar equally matched teams. While there are other factors, young players should be aware of these very important ones. These factors are as follows: to control the ball, to have a strong correctly trained defense and to develop endurance. With young players I always stress controlled play with accurate passing and controlled receiving (trapping and shielding)--for the ten field players. Along with this, dribbling must become second nature. With specific defensive player training, the goalkeeper must learn to command the team’s defenses. Finally, all players should stay in condition by running on their own. These are necessary skills for any player wishing to continue in this sport. As far as control, defense and endurance goes, the coach must assure that he or she knows what is both necessary and as well as what is unnecessary towards producing this aim. So with this introduction, I would like to discuss two games where the topics of this article apply.
Many skillful games either start off by playing a controlled passing game or settle down shortly after the start whistle, say in ten to fifteen minutes into the game. This was the way the Italian soccer match with Fiorentina vs. Udinese began on the Nov. 11, 2007 game—they were off to a slow start. Shortly after the slow start, the teams settled down into one of a controlled passing game--until about the last quarter of play. The first two goals were headers and difficult to defend against. But the second goal for Udinese, which came after about 63 minutes of play, should have been prevented by a Fiorentina defenseman obscuring the shot. Up to that last goal, both teams played a good passing game. Then in the latter part of the second half, the game became one where long-ball soccer dominated the game. With long kicks up field, the controlled passing game was in the past as each team endeavored to employ these long kicks to force another goal. It is my opinion that it is a fairly common occurrence to see teams switch from playing controlled ball soccer to kickball in order to force a goal. This is totally offensive soccer with little reliance on playing a strong defensive game of soccer along with controlled short passes: Defense soccer is the type of soccer that I strongly recommend. The score ended up with Udinese 2 and Fiorentina 1.
In addition to poor ball control in the last quarter, it often follows that roughness becomes the norm--as it did in this game. Unfortunately, excessive roughness seems to have become more and more commonplace in this sport, such as with serious fouls--tripping and pushing at high speeds from behind became common. As for myself, I see little in the way of gaining an advantage by substituting excessive fouls and roughness for good skillful play. The first yellow card was given out after about 34 minutes of play with only three given in total. I believe that more should have been given. A red card was given out after about 80 minutes of play.
On the same day, I watched the ACC Finals Women’s Soccer Championship game with FSU--Florida State University against NCU--North Carolina University. While roughness was not a problem, defense, control and endurance were issues. I will explain. It was a well-played game for much of it and a pleasure to watch: The women seem to have grasped onto playing a controlled passing game. However, as I often stress, correct defensive play is the way to win games and I believe it was a most important factor here. The North Carolina team had a super defense by maintaining correct positioning and as such only gave Florida a few good chances to get into good scoring positions.
After the second half began, Florida outplayed North Carolina with controlled passing and totally dominated the field of play, for a while a least. It was quite a start for the second half. However, they could not keep up the pace. While both teams played hard, the UNC’s control had slipped away; it appeared that the players were running out of steam. This was more apparent for the Florida Team than with North Carolina. The resulting play then became a game where both teams tried to force a goal with several long balls down field. But as usual with this type of play, goals did not come. However, North Carolina having more energy had a few good tries to score in the last quarter because the Florida defense was not holding itself in good form. The final score was UNC 1, FSU 0.
All three issues were at play here and a review of these important factors can help shed some light on the outcome of both games discussed. Many coaches stress attack soccer, but there is actually much more to the game then just teaching attack to the forward players as the teams defense is in reality the strength of the team. It behooves all coaches to accept and demand proper defensive strategy, insist upon short ground passes (whenever possible) for the whole game and close-to-the-body traps (shielded when necessary), and endurance. From experience, if all three factors are done correctly, more games are won then lost; but with the following clarifications:
1. The opponents are not in a higher classification (such as a second division team against a first division team).
2. The opponents are not made up of older players (naturally, the latter applies to youth teams only).
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
I always stress that it is important with youth soccer training that skill development should come before winning games. However, since people are also naturally interested in winning games, both achievements must actually go hand in hand. But it must be remembered that in the long hall, skills are paramount for winning against competition. Let us then review some important skills that are a prerequisite for winning soccer games.
There are three important factors for winning against similar equally matched teams. While there are other factors, young players should be aware of these very important ones. These factors are as follows: to control the ball, to have a strong correctly trained defense and to develop endurance. With young players I always stress controlled play with accurate passing and controlled receiving (trapping and shielding)--for the ten field players. Along with this, dribbling must become second nature. With specific defensive player training, the goalkeeper must learn to command the team’s defenses. Finally, all players should stay in condition by running on their own. These are necessary skills for any player wishing to continue in this sport. As far as control, defense and endurance goes, the coach must assure that he or she knows what is both necessary and as well as what is unnecessary towards producing this aim. So with this introduction, I would like to discuss two games where the topics of this article apply.
Many skillful games either start off by playing a controlled passing game or settle down shortly after the start whistle, say in ten to fifteen minutes into the game. This was the way the Italian soccer match with Fiorentina vs. Udinese began on the Nov. 11, 2007 game—they were off to a slow start. Shortly after the slow start, the teams settled down into one of a controlled passing game--until about the last quarter of play. The first two goals were headers and difficult to defend against. But the second goal for Udinese, which came after about 63 minutes of play, should have been prevented by a Fiorentina defenseman obscuring the shot. Up to that last goal, both teams played a good passing game. Then in the latter part of the second half, the game became one where long-ball soccer dominated the game. With long kicks up field, the controlled passing game was in the past as each team endeavored to employ these long kicks to force another goal. It is my opinion that it is a fairly common occurrence to see teams switch from playing controlled ball soccer to kickball in order to force a goal. This is totally offensive soccer with little reliance on playing a strong defensive game of soccer along with controlled short passes: Defense soccer is the type of soccer that I strongly recommend. The score ended up with Udinese 2 and Fiorentina 1.
In addition to poor ball control in the last quarter, it often follows that roughness becomes the norm--as it did in this game. Unfortunately, excessive roughness seems to have become more and more commonplace in this sport, such as with serious fouls--tripping and pushing at high speeds from behind became common. As for myself, I see little in the way of gaining an advantage by substituting excessive fouls and roughness for good skillful play. The first yellow card was given out after about 34 minutes of play with only three given in total. I believe that more should have been given. A red card was given out after about 80 minutes of play.
On the same day, I watched the ACC Finals Women’s Soccer Championship game with FSU--Florida State University against NCU--North Carolina University. While roughness was not a problem, defense, control and endurance were issues. I will explain. It was a well-played game for much of it and a pleasure to watch: The women seem to have grasped onto playing a controlled passing game. However, as I often stress, correct defensive play is the way to win games and I believe it was a most important factor here. The North Carolina team had a super defense by maintaining correct positioning and as such only gave Florida a few good chances to get into good scoring positions.
After the second half began, Florida outplayed North Carolina with controlled passing and totally dominated the field of play, for a while a least. It was quite a start for the second half. However, they could not keep up the pace. While both teams played hard, the UNC’s control had slipped away; it appeared that the players were running out of steam. This was more apparent for the Florida Team than with North Carolina. The resulting play then became a game where both teams tried to force a goal with several long balls down field. But as usual with this type of play, goals did not come. However, North Carolina having more energy had a few good tries to score in the last quarter because the Florida defense was not holding itself in good form. The final score was UNC 1, FSU 0.
All three issues were at play here and a review of these important factors can help shed some light on the outcome of both games discussed. Many coaches stress attack soccer, but there is actually much more to the game then just teaching attack to the forward players as the teams defense is in reality the strength of the team. It behooves all coaches to accept and demand proper defensive strategy, insist upon short ground passes (whenever possible) for the whole game and close-to-the-body traps (shielded when necessary), and endurance. From experience, if all three factors are done correctly, more games are won then lost; but with the following clarifications:
1. The opponents are not in a higher classification (such as a second division team against a first division team).
2. The opponents are not made up of older players (naturally, the latter applies to youth teams only).
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Monday, January 28, 2008
No. 20--Palermo vs. Fiorentina Italian Soccer: Confused Defense
by Soccer Coach Albert M. Luongo
Palermo had a victory over Fiorentina 2 to 0 on December 8, 2007. Palermo’s Fabrizio Miccoli scored the first goal at about 18 minutes into the game. He was able to dribble through the Fiorentina defense and had an open shot at the goal with only the goalie to oppose him. Fiorentina had many chances in the first half to score, but failed to do so.
The second half was a little more interesting. Fiorentina had several shots on goal but again failed in their attempts. Their best soccer in this half lasted for only for the first ten minutes, but many shots were very high over the goal. Palermo dominated the rest of the game. With 80 minutes on the clock, Palermo’s Simplicio scored in a similar fashion as that of the first scored goal; that is, no defenseman opposed him except for the goalkeeper.
It is my opinion that the Fiorentina defense was confused most of the game. Too, I beleive that Fiorentina’s Jorgenson, a powerful defender played up too far, helping out on attacks. This type of situation often leaves the goal unprotected. However, his shoulder-charging tackles are to be commended as this type of charge allows for player contact and is within the Laws of the Game. These shoulder-charging tackles allowed him to end up with the ball a few times.
The game was pretty rough, as the referee did not make too many calls on fouls in the second half.
Palermo deserved to win as they had a good defensive team and made it difficult for Fiorentina to get clear shots on goal. Palermo also dominated the last 35 minutes of the second half.
Here is my advice for young players and coaches.
1. Learn the rules for the best defensive techniques
2. Learn how to shoulder-charge an opponent properly. But be aware that inexperienced referees often do not know the difference between a legal shoulder charge and a foul. It is highly recommended to learn this tackle: If a legal shoulder-charge is called as an offense, you will be right and the referee will be wrong. At higher levels of soccer, this will not be much of an issue. This tackle makes for stronger players.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Palermo had a victory over Fiorentina 2 to 0 on December 8, 2007. Palermo’s Fabrizio Miccoli scored the first goal at about 18 minutes into the game. He was able to dribble through the Fiorentina defense and had an open shot at the goal with only the goalie to oppose him. Fiorentina had many chances in the first half to score, but failed to do so.
The second half was a little more interesting. Fiorentina had several shots on goal but again failed in their attempts. Their best soccer in this half lasted for only for the first ten minutes, but many shots were very high over the goal. Palermo dominated the rest of the game. With 80 minutes on the clock, Palermo’s Simplicio scored in a similar fashion as that of the first scored goal; that is, no defenseman opposed him except for the goalkeeper.
It is my opinion that the Fiorentina defense was confused most of the game. Too, I beleive that Fiorentina’s Jorgenson, a powerful defender played up too far, helping out on attacks. This type of situation often leaves the goal unprotected. However, his shoulder-charging tackles are to be commended as this type of charge allows for player contact and is within the Laws of the Game. These shoulder-charging tackles allowed him to end up with the ball a few times.
The game was pretty rough, as the referee did not make too many calls on fouls in the second half.
Palermo deserved to win as they had a good defensive team and made it difficult for Fiorentina to get clear shots on goal. Palermo also dominated the last 35 minutes of the second half.
Here is my advice for young players and coaches.
1. Learn the rules for the best defensive techniques
2. Learn how to shoulder-charge an opponent properly. But be aware that inexperienced referees often do not know the difference between a legal shoulder charge and a foul. It is highly recommended to learn this tackle: If a legal shoulder-charge is called as an offense, you will be right and the referee will be wrong. At higher levels of soccer, this will not be much of an issue. This tackle makes for stronger players.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Saturday, January 26, 2008
No. 19--Roma vs. Cagliari Italian Soccer: A Non Aggressive Cagliari, But a Clean Game along with Good Refereeing
by Soccer Coach Albert M. Luongo
Roma won the match on December 5, 2007 against Cagliari 2 to 0. It was a clean game with good refereeing; however, there were still a few yellow cards given out for serious offenses. It seems to me that a soccer match with relatively few fouls was the norm a few years ago. Back then, I can remember when players played the ball and not the man for most of the game, while today the opposite seems to be true. And pulling an opponent’s shirt now seems to be acceptable. So it is a pleasure to see a relatively clean game now and then.
Anyway Roma dominated their opponents with excellent passes while utilizing the whole team. Also, their defense was strong and well played. On the other hand Cagliari at times had sporadic passing sprees, but could not seem work their way into Roma’s goal area too often. Instead, it became necessary to take many of their shots on goal from a long way out. This is a credit to the Roma Defense.
Cagliari did have a few opportunities to score, but just couldn’t put the ball in the back of the net. They did not seem to play together as a full team either. Take this example: On one occasion, one of the forwards (I could not catch his name) made a super run with the ball up the right wing to the point where he was alone with the Roma goalkeeper, except for teammate Acquafresca—Roma’s forward. Acquafresca ran upfield staying even with the ball and to a point where he was unopposed by any defenders at the center of the goal. Had the ball been passed to him, it would have been a sure goal. Instead the ball was kicked directly at the keeper and no goal was scored. This is an example of this teams reliance on an individual’s performance rather than on teamwork. Furthermore, it was evident that Cagliari players were backing away from Roma Players on many occasions and did not seem to have sufficient stamina to play aggressively throughout the whole game.
Here are a few facts for developing personal skills that can help young players and or coaches:
1. Each player must challenge an opposing player for the ball when the opposition is on the attack
2. Each player must endeavor to win the loose ball
3. Playing as a team is always better then depending upon certain players to win the day
4. Last but not least is that all players must be in top physical condition via rigorous team and personal training.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Roma won the match on December 5, 2007 against Cagliari 2 to 0. It was a clean game with good refereeing; however, there were still a few yellow cards given out for serious offenses. It seems to me that a soccer match with relatively few fouls was the norm a few years ago. Back then, I can remember when players played the ball and not the man for most of the game, while today the opposite seems to be true. And pulling an opponent’s shirt now seems to be acceptable. So it is a pleasure to see a relatively clean game now and then.
Anyway Roma dominated their opponents with excellent passes while utilizing the whole team. Also, their defense was strong and well played. On the other hand Cagliari at times had sporadic passing sprees, but could not seem work their way into Roma’s goal area too often. Instead, it became necessary to take many of their shots on goal from a long way out. This is a credit to the Roma Defense.
Cagliari did have a few opportunities to score, but just couldn’t put the ball in the back of the net. They did not seem to play together as a full team either. Take this example: On one occasion, one of the forwards (I could not catch his name) made a super run with the ball up the right wing to the point where he was alone with the Roma goalkeeper, except for teammate Acquafresca—Roma’s forward. Acquafresca ran upfield staying even with the ball and to a point where he was unopposed by any defenders at the center of the goal. Had the ball been passed to him, it would have been a sure goal. Instead the ball was kicked directly at the keeper and no goal was scored. This is an example of this teams reliance on an individual’s performance rather than on teamwork. Furthermore, it was evident that Cagliari players were backing away from Roma Players on many occasions and did not seem to have sufficient stamina to play aggressively throughout the whole game.
Here are a few facts for developing personal skills that can help young players and or coaches:
1. Each player must challenge an opposing player for the ball when the opposition is on the attack
2. Each player must endeavor to win the loose ball
3. Playing as a team is always better then depending upon certain players to win the day
4. Last but not least is that all players must be in top physical condition via rigorous team and personal training.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Tuesday, January 22, 2008
No. 18--Fiorentina vs. Inter Milan Italian Soccer: Correct Performance during the Match
by Soccer Coach Albert M. Luongo
The final score for the game played on December 2, 2007 was Inter Milan 2, Fiorentina 0. Saying that Inter Milan totally dominated the field of play easily sums up this game. There are four very important ingredients for winning a soccer match and they are:
1. Having a better defense (starting with the goalkeeper) than one’s opponents or better yet; making few defensive errors
2. Ball control, composed of accurate and safe passes most of the time and precise trapping and shielding of the ball
3. The desire to win the loose ball
4. Endurance developed by strenuous conditioning in training
Milan certainly had the first three and possibly the forth ingredient in this match; however, the endurance factor was not quite clear. Inter Milan dominated the game with accurate passes while Fiorentina had to make the most of their ball-possession by sending the ball up to the forwards near their attacking goal and in line with Milan’s defensemen. They could do very little in the way of working the ball passed the midfield in looking for opportunities. While there is nothing wrong with sending the ball up to the goal area sometimes, it is definitely not the optimum way to get into position to score, especially against a strong defense. Fiorentina just could not seem to make many penetrations into the Milan’s defense.
It is this kind of game play that makes it obvious who will most likely be the winner. I.e., I use the term “most likely” because luck—good or bad, or a bad referee’s decisions can alter the coarse of any game—especially in low scoring games. But doing things right certainty gives any team the edge.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
The final score for the game played on December 2, 2007 was Inter Milan 2, Fiorentina 0. Saying that Inter Milan totally dominated the field of play easily sums up this game. There are four very important ingredients for winning a soccer match and they are:
1. Having a better defense (starting with the goalkeeper) than one’s opponents or better yet; making few defensive errors
2. Ball control, composed of accurate and safe passes most of the time and precise trapping and shielding of the ball
3. The desire to win the loose ball
4. Endurance developed by strenuous conditioning in training
Milan certainly had the first three and possibly the forth ingredient in this match; however, the endurance factor was not quite clear. Inter Milan dominated the game with accurate passes while Fiorentina had to make the most of their ball-possession by sending the ball up to the forwards near their attacking goal and in line with Milan’s defensemen. They could do very little in the way of working the ball passed the midfield in looking for opportunities. While there is nothing wrong with sending the ball up to the goal area sometimes, it is definitely not the optimum way to get into position to score, especially against a strong defense. Fiorentina just could not seem to make many penetrations into the Milan’s defense.
It is this kind of game play that makes it obvious who will most likely be the winner. I.e., I use the term “most likely” because luck—good or bad, or a bad referee’s decisions can alter the coarse of any game—especially in low scoring games. But doing things right certainty gives any team the edge.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Monday, January 21, 2008
No.9--Soccer Defense Again--Valencia vs. Real Murcia
by Soccer Coach Albert M. Luongo
Defense in soccer cannot be overemphasized. I endorse this approach to soccer in many articles and it is worth discussing this topic again. Many years ago after coaching, witnessing and or playing in about a few hundred games it became clear to me that defense wins games. If the defense is solid and making few mistakes, the team has a much better chance to win then by just concentrating on scoring. How can this be, one might ask? It takes goals to win? That goes without question, but when forwards and midfielders are in disarray due to continuous saves by their own goalkeeper, they too usually become in disarray. Naturally, it takes explosive and skillful forwards to score, but they are often neutralized when their whole team is wholly dependent upon these players to save the day.
Now if the defense is in good form, attacking players midfielders and forwards can better concentrate on their job for attacking the goal and not hang back on defense. They often play more as a team as a result. And it is team support, rather than individual players, that usually wins games by giving strong support to the strong attacking players.
One of the obvious problem signs to look for are goals scored (or goals missed) because one or more forward players broke through the defensive line—and defenders are chasing them. Defensive players should act as a shield, thus preventing a clear shot by the attacker. Therefore they should back up with their opponent and not commit themselves endeavoring to tackle the ball. This tactic helps the goalkeeper make predictions as to where to stand if a shot on goal comes. Naturally, there are other tactics needed by defensive players, but they are not germane to this article.
Real Murcia vs.Valencia played on November 11 and the results of the game support what was said above. The score ended 3 to 0 in favor of Valancia. The latter defense was solid. Murcia’s defensemen however, were often chasing Valancia players that were rushing toward their attacking goal—this is an earmark of a weak defense as described above. Even though, Murcia frequently had better control of the ball in midfield, they found Valancia’s defense difficult to penetrate. When Murcia got near the Valancia defense, they had very few clear shots on goal. Yet ,Valancia had better opportunities near the Murcia goal and scored three times as a result of the weaker defense.
A similar situation occurred with the Argentina first division soccer match--Boca Juniors vs.Velez Sarsfield on November 13, 2007. At least two or possibly all four of the goals occurred due to defensive errors of this nature.
When I see games like the above with high scoring shutouts, it is obvious to me that the losing coach is not aware on how to prevent goals. He or she probably is just concentrating on the forward line; that is a mistake. The coach should make it a point to concentrate on the defensive line.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Defense in soccer cannot be overemphasized. I endorse this approach to soccer in many articles and it is worth discussing this topic again. Many years ago after coaching, witnessing and or playing in about a few hundred games it became clear to me that defense wins games. If the defense is solid and making few mistakes, the team has a much better chance to win then by just concentrating on scoring. How can this be, one might ask? It takes goals to win? That goes without question, but when forwards and midfielders are in disarray due to continuous saves by their own goalkeeper, they too usually become in disarray. Naturally, it takes explosive and skillful forwards to score, but they are often neutralized when their whole team is wholly dependent upon these players to save the day.
Now if the defense is in good form, attacking players midfielders and forwards can better concentrate on their job for attacking the goal and not hang back on defense. They often play more as a team as a result. And it is team support, rather than individual players, that usually wins games by giving strong support to the strong attacking players.
One of the obvious problem signs to look for are goals scored (or goals missed) because one or more forward players broke through the defensive line—and defenders are chasing them. Defensive players should act as a shield, thus preventing a clear shot by the attacker. Therefore they should back up with their opponent and not commit themselves endeavoring to tackle the ball. This tactic helps the goalkeeper make predictions as to where to stand if a shot on goal comes. Naturally, there are other tactics needed by defensive players, but they are not germane to this article.
Real Murcia vs.Valencia played on November 11 and the results of the game support what was said above. The score ended 3 to 0 in favor of Valancia. The latter defense was solid. Murcia’s defensemen however, were often chasing Valancia players that were rushing toward their attacking goal—this is an earmark of a weak defense as described above. Even though, Murcia frequently had better control of the ball in midfield, they found Valancia’s defense difficult to penetrate. When Murcia got near the Valancia defense, they had very few clear shots on goal. Yet ,Valancia had better opportunities near the Murcia goal and scored three times as a result of the weaker defense.
A similar situation occurred with the Argentina first division soccer match--Boca Juniors vs.Velez Sarsfield on November 13, 2007. At least two or possibly all four of the goals occurred due to defensive errors of this nature.
When I see games like the above with high scoring shutouts, it is obvious to me that the losing coach is not aware on how to prevent goals. He or she probably is just concentrating on the forward line; that is a mistake. The coach should make it a point to concentrate on the defensive line.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
No. 10--Soccer: Columbia vs. Brazil and The Importance of a Good Defense
by Soccer Coach Albert M. Luongo
Columbia vs. Brazil
This was match number one of the South American Qualifiers played on Qctober 14, 2007--for the 2010 World Cup Qualifying Match: At times this scoreless game was exciting to watch. Yet at other times it was a sleepy passing game in each team’s defensive part of the field. At times, there was no opposition by attacking players as each team slowly passed the ball around. This passing game was almost like slow motion as sometimes can be seen in South American soccer. However, at other times, it was clearly top division type of play and enjoyable.
Why was this a zero to zero game? The answer lies in the fact that both defenses made few errors. This tight defending required most shots taken on goal to be from long distances. So for the most part, the game was held at the midfield, but with great passes and control there. This was especially true for Columbia as they dominated the passing game most of the time. Similarly, young players should emulate passing and control this way. And, coaches should get their players to accurately pass, trap and shield, and control the ball. In addition coaches desiring more wins, should learn to recognize and promote proper defense, not just offense.
Young players should realize that ball control begins by trapping long or hard passes such as was seen in this game. To develop this skill, kicking the soccer ball back and forth should always be with long hard kicks and nearly dead-stop traps--no other way. This should take place both at practices or when just playing around with a soccer ball. Note: It is commonly practiced to just deflect a soccer ball at a slow to medium pace back to the kicker without settling it. As such, little in the way of skills can be learned or developed from this practically fruitless exercise. The dribbling displayed in this game illustrated what can be obtained with lots of dribbling practice. With my teams, as coach, I would assign prescribed dribbling drills to be practiced by the players in-between practices. These drills improve balance, speed and accuracy for this skill. Then at the following practice, players were required to demonstrate the assigned home-drill dribbling. I would then access each player’s skill. Players that performed the assigned home drills always faired better than those that did little homework and, the dribbling also showed up in games.
As for coaches, they should endeavor to learn to recognize what a strong defense can do to prevent goals. Preventing goals from being scored against one’s team naturally means that it only takes one goal to win. Some coaches never seem to understand this as they endeavor to always push forward and seem to disregard the team’s defense training.
Also to be recognized is the importance of ball possession. Short passes, starting with the goalkeeper, maintain possession longer. They are far more important than gaining distance by long indiscriminate kicks, head flicks and headers up field. Often this type of play brings the ball immediately back into “dangerous” territory where the defensive team must once again be on defense.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Columbia vs. Brazil
This was match number one of the South American Qualifiers played on Qctober 14, 2007--for the 2010 World Cup Qualifying Match: At times this scoreless game was exciting to watch. Yet at other times it was a sleepy passing game in each team’s defensive part of the field. At times, there was no opposition by attacking players as each team slowly passed the ball around. This passing game was almost like slow motion as sometimes can be seen in South American soccer. However, at other times, it was clearly top division type of play and enjoyable.
Why was this a zero to zero game? The answer lies in the fact that both defenses made few errors. This tight defending required most shots taken on goal to be from long distances. So for the most part, the game was held at the midfield, but with great passes and control there. This was especially true for Columbia as they dominated the passing game most of the time. Similarly, young players should emulate passing and control this way. And, coaches should get their players to accurately pass, trap and shield, and control the ball. In addition coaches desiring more wins, should learn to recognize and promote proper defense, not just offense.
Young players should realize that ball control begins by trapping long or hard passes such as was seen in this game. To develop this skill, kicking the soccer ball back and forth should always be with long hard kicks and nearly dead-stop traps--no other way. This should take place both at practices or when just playing around with a soccer ball. Note: It is commonly practiced to just deflect a soccer ball at a slow to medium pace back to the kicker without settling it. As such, little in the way of skills can be learned or developed from this practically fruitless exercise. The dribbling displayed in this game illustrated what can be obtained with lots of dribbling practice. With my teams, as coach, I would assign prescribed dribbling drills to be practiced by the players in-between practices. These drills improve balance, speed and accuracy for this skill. Then at the following practice, players were required to demonstrate the assigned home-drill dribbling. I would then access each player’s skill. Players that performed the assigned home drills always faired better than those that did little homework and, the dribbling also showed up in games.
As for coaches, they should endeavor to learn to recognize what a strong defense can do to prevent goals. Preventing goals from being scored against one’s team naturally means that it only takes one goal to win. Some coaches never seem to understand this as they endeavor to always push forward and seem to disregard the team’s defense training.
Also to be recognized is the importance of ball possession. Short passes, starting with the goalkeeper, maintain possession longer. They are far more important than gaining distance by long indiscriminate kicks, head flicks and headers up field. Often this type of play brings the ball immediately back into “dangerous” territory where the defensive team must once again be on defense.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
No. 11--Real Madrid vs. Mallorca, Soccer from Spain on Nov. 11, 2007
by Soccer Coach Albert M. Luongo
If you like high scoring games, this was one to watch. Rabinho for Real Madrid had a great game, not only because he scored two goals and gave a great assist to Raul’s goal, but his speed and dribbling skills were unsurpassed. Varela for Mallorca (pronounced Majorka) also had a good game with his two goals. The score ended 4 to 3 in favor of Real Madrid. But this high scoring game was the cause of mediocre defenses. Some of the goals could have been prevented if a defender had been positioned in front of the kicker instead of giving chase to the scoring attacker.
The worst botched defenses happened on at least two occasions. The first one was when a Mallorca defender slid for the ball just before it was crossed from the left wing to Robinho. The defender missed the tackle and ended on the ground allowing a perfect cross go to Robinho’s head to score the first goal. This type of tackle situation occurred again later in the game even though, no goal was scored at that time. In soccer it is generally considered a capitol sin for a defender to be on the ground when there is no teammate to back him or her up. I.e., slide tackles should not be attempted in situations where if missed, an opponent has an open shot at the goal or has the ability to make a clear cross.
For young players and coaches, the following should be observed as objectives to strive for:
1. The dribbling of Rabinho was fantastic as he beat and faked several defenders throughout the game. Young players should practice prescribed dribbling drills on their own, away from the soccer practices if they wish to be great players.
2. Rabinho’s speed and endurance was also in top form. Young soccer players also need to do endurance running on their own.
3. Defenders, especially the ones immediately in front of the goal should always be goal-side of the person that they are guarding or should be guarding. The defenders in this game for the most part were not goal-side of their opponent when in “dangerous” situations. Thus they allowed open shots on goal (shots not blocked by a defender). Note: Defenders should maintain screening cover in front of their attacker and not attempt to dislodge the ball unless it is out of control by the attacker. This latter move (tackeling the ball at the exact moment that it is out of control by the dribbler) only comes with experience. The precise timing to execute it usually needs to be relearned with each new soccer season.
One of my best games as a defender was one where I carefully guarded a certain player. Our opponents that day had a strong well-known striker. During this game I stayed with him and remained goal-side on each and every play while our team was on the defense (i.e., when the other team had the ball). This striker had few opportunities that day and was scoreless that game. My teammates congratulated me that day for a great game, even though I had only a few contacts with the ball.
The worst botched defenses happened on at least two occasions. The first one was when a Mallorca defender slid for the ball just before it was crossed from the left wing to Robinho. The defender missed the tackle and ended on the ground allowing a perfect cross go to Robinho’s head to score the first goal. This type of tackle situation occurred again later in the game even though, no goal was scored at that time. In soccer it is generally considered a capitol sin for a defender to be on the ground when there is no teammate to back him or her up. I.e., slide tackles should not be attempted in situations where if missed, an opponent has an open shot at the goal or has the ability to make a clear cross.
For young players and coaches, the following should be observed as objectives to strive for:
1. The dribbling of Rabinho was fantastic as he beat and faked several defenders throughout the game. Young players should practice prescribed dribbling drills on their own, away from the soccer practices if they wish to be great players.
2. Rabinho’s speed and endurance was also in top form. Young soccer players also need to do endurance running on their own.
3. Defenders, especially the ones immediately in front of the goal should always be goal-side of the person that they are guarding or should be guarding. The defenders in this game for the most part were not goal-side of their opponent when in “dangerous” situations. Thus they allowed open shots on goal (shots not blocked by a defender). Note: Defenders should maintain screening cover in front of their attacker and not attempt to dislodge the ball unless it is out of control by the attacker. This latter move (tackeling the ball at the exact moment that it is out of control by the dribbler) only comes with experience. The precise timing to execute it usually needs to be relearned with each new soccer season.
One of my best games as a defender was one where I carefully guarded a certain player. Our opponents that day had a strong well-known striker. During this game I stayed with him and remained goal-side on each and every play while our team was on the defense (i.e., when the other team had the ball). This striker had few opportunities that day and was scoreless that game. My teammates congratulated me that day for a great game, even though I had only a few contacts with the ball.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
