by Soccer Coach Albert M. Luongo
On March 23, 3008, Valencia beat Real Madrid at Madrid 3-2. Most of the game was dominated by Real Madrid's attacks on goal, but Valencia managed to thwart most Real Madrid’s attempts at scoring.
The goals in the first half were scored in the following manner. At minute 33, Valencia’s David Villa controlled the ball in a breakaway and caught Real’s defense off guard: It looked like Real's offside trap failed. He dribbled up to about the penalty spot and kicked the ball into the net. One minute later, Real’s Rabino sent a long ball to Raul’s head as he was standing about 7 yards directly in the center of the goal. He headed it into the net with no chance for Valencia’s goalkeeper Hilderbrand to stop it.
The goals in the second half went like this. At 11 minutes in, with no one guarding Raul, he received a pass in front of the goal with only the opposing goalkeeper to his front. He easily shot the ball into the net. At minute 21, the equalizer came when Villa scored his second goal on a penalty kick: The keeper went right and the ball went left making the score 2-2. The penalty came when Real’s Cannavaro pushed down Valencia’s Silva in the penalty area. The final goal came at minute 43 when once again Real Madrid’s defense was caught too far up field. Angel Arizmendi of Valencia received a long pass at the right wing. He trapped the ball and curled in towards the goal. Only one defender was to his front. He managed to dribble the ball (a few yards in parallel with the goal line) in towards the goal after beating the defender. With no other defenders near, Real’s goalkeeper Castillas only opposed him. With only a slight angle to the goal, he shot the ball passed Castillas making the score 3-2.
Valancia had only a few chances to score in the second half as the ball was mostly played at the other end of the field. This fact made it apparent that Real Madrid’s players became overconfident due to the numerous scoring opportunities causing them to drop their defensive guard. Nevertheless, the game was exciting and action packed with few dull moments. The referee should have called more fouls however.
Discussion:
What circumstances were attributed to losing the game for a team that continually dominated the forward line of attack? There are two obvious factors: Lack of concern for defense and causing a foul to take place in the penalty area. These are described succinctly:
Defense: I believe that the first and third goal was due to the offside trap backfiring. I have never been a big fan of the offside trap as it can be fatal when it goes wrong. This can and did leave the goal defenseless.
Penalties (or excessive roughness): Fouling a player in and around the goal area can cause a defeat: in this case it did cause a defeat.
Valencia, it seems, played a strong defensive. Many attempts on scoring by Real Madrid were stopped. And, it seemed that Real Madrid became over confidant based upon their dominance near their opponent’s goal. When Valencia had a chance to score, they took advantage of the Real’s over-confidence: This type of football (soccer), where a team is strong in defense but weak in offense, more than occasionally wins the match.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Thursday, March 27, 2008
No. 30--Soccer: United States vs Sweden in an Exhibition Game: USA Outplayed Sweden, But Only a Fair Game to Watch
by Soccer Coach Albert M. Luongo
The USA national team beat Sweden 2 to 0. USA defender Eddie Robinson scored early in the first half with a good goal. The shot came from his foot in a crowded defensive area. After that the game became sloppy on both sides with trapping and passing. Both teams had scoring chances but the USA’s attacks were slightly more coordinated. Even though both sides had difficulty making coordinated attacks, the USA team dominated most of the first half.
In the second half, the USA's set plays became more coordinated for longer periods, but they also had just as many poor periods. Sweden had a few attempts, but could not keep up with the Americans. USA used the wings and set plays at times with professional precision, but not on a continual basis. It would appear that Sweden was in poorer condition and their attacks were often below standard for such a team in this competition.
The game became a free for all near the end and several yellow cards were issued. However the referee had excellent control and prudently awarded yellow cards when violent fouls took place.
In the 46th minute, Sweden’s Bjarsmyr took down the American player Altidorre and USA was awarded a penalty kick. Landon Donovan scored goal no. 2. He had an excellent game in addition to scoring the penalty kick.
For the most part, Sweden’s goalkeeper as well as the defensive team made too many long kicks. They need to keep the ball on the ground more often and improve their trapping.
At times the playing was like a second division high school game while at other times (not too often) the play was professional. The final score of 2-0 was just about right for this match. Both teams could also use a stronger defense to reduce the number of dangerous shots on goal. Also, too many corner kicks were awarded due to the ball constantly crossing the goal line. However, the USA goalkeeper Brad Guzan made several good saves preventing Sweden from scoring.
Discussion:
If the USA intends to be a future competitor against top world class teams, it needs to be in better condition in order to maintain a consistent passing game. Also they need to practice their trapping under pressure. Both teams need to strengthen their defense to better protect the goal, receive more passes from the goalkeepers and to be stronger in order to prevent the ball from going over the goal line.
Sweden had a few more violent fouls against the USA. One such foul caused a penalty kick and one or two other fouls could have caused an ejection of a player.
It is my opinion that both teams needed to be in better physical condition to be more competitive against stronger teams.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself
The USA national team beat Sweden 2 to 0. USA defender Eddie Robinson scored early in the first half with a good goal. The shot came from his foot in a crowded defensive area. After that the game became sloppy on both sides with trapping and passing. Both teams had scoring chances but the USA’s attacks were slightly more coordinated. Even though both sides had difficulty making coordinated attacks, the USA team dominated most of the first half.
In the second half, the USA's set plays became more coordinated for longer periods, but they also had just as many poor periods. Sweden had a few attempts, but could not keep up with the Americans. USA used the wings and set plays at times with professional precision, but not on a continual basis. It would appear that Sweden was in poorer condition and their attacks were often below standard for such a team in this competition.
The game became a free for all near the end and several yellow cards were issued. However the referee had excellent control and prudently awarded yellow cards when violent fouls took place.
In the 46th minute, Sweden’s Bjarsmyr took down the American player Altidorre and USA was awarded a penalty kick. Landon Donovan scored goal no. 2. He had an excellent game in addition to scoring the penalty kick.
For the most part, Sweden’s goalkeeper as well as the defensive team made too many long kicks. They need to keep the ball on the ground more often and improve their trapping.
At times the playing was like a second division high school game while at other times (not too often) the play was professional. The final score of 2-0 was just about right for this match. Both teams could also use a stronger defense to reduce the number of dangerous shots on goal. Also, too many corner kicks were awarded due to the ball constantly crossing the goal line. However, the USA goalkeeper Brad Guzan made several good saves preventing Sweden from scoring.
Discussion:
If the USA intends to be a future competitor against top world class teams, it needs to be in better condition in order to maintain a consistent passing game. Also they need to practice their trapping under pressure. Both teams need to strengthen their defense to better protect the goal, receive more passes from the goalkeepers and to be stronger in order to prevent the ball from going over the goal line.
Sweden had a few more violent fouls against the USA. One such foul caused a penalty kick and one or two other fouls could have caused an ejection of a player.
It is my opinion that both teams needed to be in better physical condition to be more competitive against stronger teams.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself
Saturday, March 22, 2008
No. 40—USA vs. Canada Soccer—USA Displayed World Class Soccer Abilities
by Soccer Coach Albert M. Luongo
On March 20, 3008, USA beat Canada in Nashville TN 3 to 0. The USA dominated the field in this game with short, low-ball passing and aggressiveness to win the loose ball. Sometimes though, they were too aggressive as is often the case with American style soccer. One such extreme example of this was when USA’s Altidore’s inexcusable collision with Canada’s goalkeeper Wagner. It was followed by a shove to the goalkeeper. What was the referee thinking when he did not issue red card or even yellow card Altidore? With this said, this win means that USA will go on to play in the 2010 Olympics.
Canada on the other hand, had difficulty getting past the midfield and often backed off by not pressurizing their opponents. At times however Canada had a few good attacks and won the loose ball with good shoulder-charging but could not score. Several of their shots were in haste and went extremely high. Thus, the USA goalkeeper Chris Seitz was hardly tested during this game.
The scoring went like this. At minute 26, USA's Freddy Adu scored on a free kick from the right side about 5 yards from the penalty area. He curved the ball around a 2 man wall (a 3 or 4 man wall might have prevented the goal). The ball deflected off the right hand of Canada’s goalkeeper Wagner and went into the left-hand corner.
At approximately 3 minutes into the second half, USA’s Adu scored again on another free kick as he took the shot from the right side outside of the penalty area. He placed it over the wall. At minute 78, a pass went to USA’s Kljestan from the left wing. There was a breach in the defensive wall, giving Kljestan a clear shot at the Canadian goal as he stood near its center at about the penalty spot. He put the ball near the inside left post making the score 3-0.
Finally in the second half, yellow cards were issued, but at this time the referee’s authority was not respected.
Analysis
I was glad to finally see a USA game or team that did not disappoint me. Too frequently, I had observed long ball soccer, sloppy passing and trapping, and excessive roughness. This roughness seems to come from the grass roots of USA soccer as it is often passed on by our experiences with American football. I observed this roughness first hand with my earlier soccer experiences: Often I had to instruct foreign born players with my shoulder-charging drill in order for them to effectively deal with such roughness coming from competing American teams. While the American roughness still shows through, skillful playing seems to have caught on—at least with this team. These displayed skills will be necessary for the USA to effectively compete in the 2010 Olympics. I give my complements to the USA coaches and manager, but caution them that excessive roughness can cause players to be ejected, producing an obvious disadvantage.
One more note on the USA team. Continual pressurization of their opponents indicates that they are in top physical form from their training and conditioning. This too is an important ingredient for high competitive matches.
I cannot condone liberal referees. Their job is to enforce the FIFA Laws of the Game (Note: it is necessary to scroll down when reaching this web site).
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
On March 20, 3008, USA beat Canada in Nashville TN 3 to 0. The USA dominated the field in this game with short, low-ball passing and aggressiveness to win the loose ball. Sometimes though, they were too aggressive as is often the case with American style soccer. One such extreme example of this was when USA’s Altidore’s inexcusable collision with Canada’s goalkeeper Wagner. It was followed by a shove to the goalkeeper. What was the referee thinking when he did not issue red card or even yellow card Altidore? With this said, this win means that USA will go on to play in the 2010 Olympics.
Canada on the other hand, had difficulty getting past the midfield and often backed off by not pressurizing their opponents. At times however Canada had a few good attacks and won the loose ball with good shoulder-charging but could not score. Several of their shots were in haste and went extremely high. Thus, the USA goalkeeper Chris Seitz was hardly tested during this game.
The scoring went like this. At minute 26, USA's Freddy Adu scored on a free kick from the right side about 5 yards from the penalty area. He curved the ball around a 2 man wall (a 3 or 4 man wall might have prevented the goal). The ball deflected off the right hand of Canada’s goalkeeper Wagner and went into the left-hand corner.
At approximately 3 minutes into the second half, USA’s Adu scored again on another free kick as he took the shot from the right side outside of the penalty area. He placed it over the wall. At minute 78, a pass went to USA’s Kljestan from the left wing. There was a breach in the defensive wall, giving Kljestan a clear shot at the Canadian goal as he stood near its center at about the penalty spot. He put the ball near the inside left post making the score 3-0.
Finally in the second half, yellow cards were issued, but at this time the referee’s authority was not respected.
Analysis
I was glad to finally see a USA game or team that did not disappoint me. Too frequently, I had observed long ball soccer, sloppy passing and trapping, and excessive roughness. This roughness seems to come from the grass roots of USA soccer as it is often passed on by our experiences with American football. I observed this roughness first hand with my earlier soccer experiences: Often I had to instruct foreign born players with my shoulder-charging drill in order for them to effectively deal with such roughness coming from competing American teams. While the American roughness still shows through, skillful playing seems to have caught on—at least with this team. These displayed skills will be necessary for the USA to effectively compete in the 2010 Olympics. I give my complements to the USA coaches and manager, but caution them that excessive roughness can cause players to be ejected, producing an obvious disadvantage.
One more note on the USA team. Continual pressurization of their opponents indicates that they are in top physical form from their training and conditioning. This too is an important ingredient for high competitive matches.
I cannot condone liberal referees. Their job is to enforce the FIFA Laws of the Game (Note: it is necessary to scroll down when reaching this web site).
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
No. 29--Soccer: Manchester United vs. New Castle United Soccer: Six Goals For Manchester in the Second Half
by Soccer Coach Albert M. Luongo
The match took place on January 12, 2008. The score was Manchester United 6, New Castle United 0. All 6 goals were scored in the second half. Manchester totally dominated New Castle United except for a few short periods in each half.
Manchester United’s playing was well executed and it appeared to me that the team was well coached in passing techniques and driven hard by its endurance training. Their ball shielding was also superb. New Castle’s playing appeared to be just the opposite where the passing (except for only a few brief periods) was lacking along with their stamina. While they held up during the first half, they only had two shots on goal, Manchester had 10. Several of which were by Wayne Rooney: Several of his shots were on the mark, but most were stopped by New Castle’s goalkeeper. One could say that Rooney had an unlucky game that day.
The scoring for Manchester United (second half) went like this. At 49 minutes, Cristiano Ronaldo scored on a free kick just outside the penalty area. He kicked the ball at the wall and it went under the feet of New Castles’s players. For some reason the defenders in the wall jumped up and the ball went under their feet directly into the goal. At 54 minutes, the ball was fed back to Tevez during a defensive confusion of New Castle giving him a clear shot. Ronaldo at minute 69 received a pass and had an unopposed shot on goal. At the 85th minute Ferdinand was unmarked as he received a pass at the right wing and scored. At the 87th minute Ronaldo scored his 3rd goal and at the 90th minute Tevez scored his second goal by hitting the cross bar and the ball shot down to just barely cross the goal line.
Two yellow cards were given and a red card was issued to New Castle’s A. Smith at the 93rd minute. The referee was lenient on many fouls and fortunately it was a relatively clean game, making it a nice game to watch.
Summary of Important Information Necessary for Young Players and Coaches
Obviously with the score being 6-0, Manchester United’s playing skills were far superior to that of New Castle. Manchester United made few mistakes to speak of and their endurance was high as proven by the fact that they scored the last 3 goals in the last 6 minutes. This would indicate that their opponents could not keep up with them as well along with seeing their defenses break down. While I am speculating on Manchester’s endurance training, the results of the last 3 or 5 goals do indicate that strenuous endurance training must have been a factor for developing such a top soccer team. It takes a high amount of energy by players to continue to play where they make few passing errors as well as the way they demonstrated such great ball shielding .
It should be pointed out that when defending on a direct or indirect kick, it is not a good idea to jump up unless the kicked ball is high. I.e. remaining stationary is the best defense. Jumping up defeats the wall’s purpose. I say this even though my opinion is that a wall in front of the goal should not be permitted in soccer. Allowing a wall gives the defending team a good reason to take down an opponent who may be dangerously close to scoring. Disallowing walls would bring up the number of goals scored and who wouldn’t like that. It might even reduce the number of fouls.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
The match took place on January 12, 2008. The score was Manchester United 6, New Castle United 0. All 6 goals were scored in the second half. Manchester totally dominated New Castle United except for a few short periods in each half.
Manchester United’s playing was well executed and it appeared to me that the team was well coached in passing techniques and driven hard by its endurance training. Their ball shielding was also superb. New Castle’s playing appeared to be just the opposite where the passing (except for only a few brief periods) was lacking along with their stamina. While they held up during the first half, they only had two shots on goal, Manchester had 10. Several of which were by Wayne Rooney: Several of his shots were on the mark, but most were stopped by New Castle’s goalkeeper. One could say that Rooney had an unlucky game that day.
The scoring for Manchester United (second half) went like this. At 49 minutes, Cristiano Ronaldo scored on a free kick just outside the penalty area. He kicked the ball at the wall and it went under the feet of New Castles’s players. For some reason the defenders in the wall jumped up and the ball went under their feet directly into the goal. At 54 minutes, the ball was fed back to Tevez during a defensive confusion of New Castle giving him a clear shot. Ronaldo at minute 69 received a pass and had an unopposed shot on goal. At the 85th minute Ferdinand was unmarked as he received a pass at the right wing and scored. At the 87th minute Ronaldo scored his 3rd goal and at the 90th minute Tevez scored his second goal by hitting the cross bar and the ball shot down to just barely cross the goal line.
Two yellow cards were given and a red card was issued to New Castle’s A. Smith at the 93rd minute. The referee was lenient on many fouls and fortunately it was a relatively clean game, making it a nice game to watch.
Summary of Important Information Necessary for Young Players and Coaches
Obviously with the score being 6-0, Manchester United’s playing skills were far superior to that of New Castle. Manchester United made few mistakes to speak of and their endurance was high as proven by the fact that they scored the last 3 goals in the last 6 minutes. This would indicate that their opponents could not keep up with them as well along with seeing their defenses break down. While I am speculating on Manchester’s endurance training, the results of the last 3 or 5 goals do indicate that strenuous endurance training must have been a factor for developing such a top soccer team. It takes a high amount of energy by players to continue to play where they make few passing errors as well as the way they demonstrated such great ball shielding .
It should be pointed out that when defending on a direct or indirect kick, it is not a good idea to jump up unless the kicked ball is high. I.e. remaining stationary is the best defense. Jumping up defeats the wall’s purpose. I say this even though my opinion is that a wall in front of the goal should not be permitted in soccer. Allowing a wall gives the defending team a good reason to take down an opponent who may be dangerously close to scoring. Disallowing walls would bring up the number of goals scored and who wouldn’t like that. It might even reduce the number of fouls.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Wednesday, March 19, 2008
No. 28--Soccer: Real Madrid vs. Zaragoza—Spanish Soccer: Mistakes made by Both Teams
By Soccer Coach Albert M. Luongo
The game was played between Real Madrid and Real Zaragoza on January 6, 2008 with final score Real Madrid 2, Zaragoza 0. There were many tactical errors that in my opinion, should have been far less for teams in the Primera Liga
1. Goalkeeping. While Zaragoza had many shots on goal during the entire game, Real Madrid’s goalkeeper Castillas managed to stop each one of them. The same situation held true for Zaragoza’s goalkeeper Vallejo, but two balls got past him. Not being able to count on their defenders to screen shots on goal required both goalkeepers to be quite effective and at times flamboyant. However, with these great saves come risks. The risks come about when not mustering defenders to protect the goal--sooner or later the ball will go into the back of the net, even though this did not happen that day for Real Madrid. Near the end of the match, I must say however, that Real Madrid’s midfield players helped Castillas in the defense around the goal.
Other errors.
2. At least 4 kicked shots on goal in the first half were shots to the moon such as at the 36 minute mark by Zaragoza’s Celades and another at 39 minutes by another team member. For Real Madrid, Marcelo’s shots at 29 and 44 minutes were high over the goal. There were also others during this match.
3. The passes from both sides often were in error as the ball was intercepted quite frequently.
4. Many passes were long and in the air that contributed to the interceptions.
5. Dribbling into opponents directly and losing the ball is inexcusable.
6. Zaragoza seemed to slow down in the last half indicating that their stamina was less than desired for their players to be competitive.
7. The game became quite rough during the second half, while the referee overlooked some fouls quite often.
The goals for Real Madrid were scored by Ruud Van Nistelrooy’s header from a nice cross by Robinho at 65 minutes with no chance for the goalkeeper to save this shot. The other goal came from Robinho (by himself) at the 76th minute. His speed enabled him to dribble the ball unimpeded towards the goal while two of Zaragoza’s defenders gave chase.
Advice to young players and coaches
1. Goalkeepers must take command of their defense. They should call back players to defend the goal and instruct them where to play during attacks.
2. Shots on goal: One of the easiest things to do when attempting to score under pressure is to kick the ball very high over the goal. This error can be lessened if getting over the ball prior to the kick is practiced beforehand.
3. Care in passing should take place and not done in a panic. If necessary, turn around and shield the ball while looking for an open player. Passes should not be to players that are closely marked. This does not apply for crosses.
4. Passes should be on the ground whenever possible and to open players.
5. Shielding the ball instead of trying to dribble through defending opponents is preferred.
6. Endurance training is a must before and during soccer training.
7. Kicking-fouls and other violent fouls can cause ejection from the game thus reducing your team’s chances from winning. Make tackles directly to the ball and not to the legs.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
The game was played between Real Madrid and Real Zaragoza on January 6, 2008 with final score Real Madrid 2, Zaragoza 0. There were many tactical errors that in my opinion, should have been far less for teams in the Primera Liga
1. Goalkeeping. While Zaragoza had many shots on goal during the entire game, Real Madrid’s goalkeeper Castillas managed to stop each one of them. The same situation held true for Zaragoza’s goalkeeper Vallejo, but two balls got past him. Not being able to count on their defenders to screen shots on goal required both goalkeepers to be quite effective and at times flamboyant. However, with these great saves come risks. The risks come about when not mustering defenders to protect the goal--sooner or later the ball will go into the back of the net, even though this did not happen that day for Real Madrid. Near the end of the match, I must say however, that Real Madrid’s midfield players helped Castillas in the defense around the goal.
Other errors.
2. At least 4 kicked shots on goal in the first half were shots to the moon such as at the 36 minute mark by Zaragoza’s Celades and another at 39 minutes by another team member. For Real Madrid, Marcelo’s shots at 29 and 44 minutes were high over the goal. There were also others during this match.
3. The passes from both sides often were in error as the ball was intercepted quite frequently.
4. Many passes were long and in the air that contributed to the interceptions.
5. Dribbling into opponents directly and losing the ball is inexcusable.
6. Zaragoza seemed to slow down in the last half indicating that their stamina was less than desired for their players to be competitive.
7. The game became quite rough during the second half, while the referee overlooked some fouls quite often.
The goals for Real Madrid were scored by Ruud Van Nistelrooy’s header from a nice cross by Robinho at 65 minutes with no chance for the goalkeeper to save this shot. The other goal came from Robinho (by himself) at the 76th minute. His speed enabled him to dribble the ball unimpeded towards the goal while two of Zaragoza’s defenders gave chase.
Advice to young players and coaches
1. Goalkeepers must take command of their defense. They should call back players to defend the goal and instruct them where to play during attacks.
2. Shots on goal: One of the easiest things to do when attempting to score under pressure is to kick the ball very high over the goal. This error can be lessened if getting over the ball prior to the kick is practiced beforehand.
3. Care in passing should take place and not done in a panic. If necessary, turn around and shield the ball while looking for an open player. Passes should not be to players that are closely marked. This does not apply for crosses.
4. Passes should be on the ground whenever possible and to open players.
5. Shielding the ball instead of trying to dribble through defending opponents is preferred.
6. Endurance training is a must before and during soccer training.
7. Kicking-fouls and other violent fouls can cause ejection from the game thus reducing your team’s chances from winning. Make tackles directly to the ball and not to the legs.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
No.33—South American Soccer, Argentina: Boca Juniors vs. River Plate—A game Without Finesse
by Soccer Coach Albert M. Luongo
The game was played on January 26, 2008. I expected it to be a game of super quality since it was a match between two Argentine top teams: Argentina being one of the world’s top produces world-class players. However I was quite disappointed as these two super rivals battled it out on the soccer field. Only three yellow cards were issued in the first half—far too little in my opinion. The final score was Boca Juniors 2 and River Plate 0. I did not enjoy the match.
It was a war for the most part. The weapons used were tripping and kicking the legs. And, it was a poor passing game with lots of long balls sent up field with no particular player intended for receiving the ball. The game’s first quarter was dominated mostly by River Plate, but soon afterwards, they seemed to lose their edge.
What I also could not understand, even though it is a minor point, is that both goalkeepers were allowed to wear dark uniforms very similar in color to that of Boca’s uniform. I suspect that the shades may have been slightly different, but it was not by much.
Anyway, the game went like this. Boca’s Sebastian Battaglia scored at 19 minutes into the match. There was no defender in front of the net as he stood about 30 yards out from the center of the goal. He kicked a hard side volley from this distance and scored the only goal in the first half.
The game in the second half was mostly dominated by Boca as they were everywhere the ball went. Their energy never seemed to cease; but River’s team seemed to feel their energy leave them. They had much difficulty getting beyond the midfield resulting in mistakes such as trapping and passing errors, and kicking long balls upfield.
At 55 minutes into the game, River Plate’s Ortega got an elbow on the jaw and was subsequently tripped and or pushed, but no yellow card was issued to the offender. At the 57th minute, Boca’s Juan Riquelme kicked the ball to River’s goalkeeper who flat-handed the ball sending it straight up in the air. Boca's Martin Palermo then headed the ball into the back of the net as it descended while holding onto the crossbar with one hand. This goal was caused by a goalkeeper error using his hands the wrong way. At the 58th minute, the 6th yellow card was issued.
Analysis:
The game reminded me of a highly competitive high school game, but at 1.5 times the speed. By that I mean the players made many mistakes by doing plenty of high speed running and kicking long balls, but often not with skillful efficiency. However, in Boca Junior’s favor was their apparent top physical conditioning. This allowed them to maintain a highly energetic pace until the end of the match.
In general, the less than skillful play by these two teams does not reach the standards set by top South American or European teams. I suspect that the impassioned rivalry of both teams’ fans have instilled the need for aggressive play over skillful play.
Also, the refereeing was lacking by allowing both teams to constantly go for the legs of players rather than the ball. The referee clearly should have intervened earlier in the game to curb some of the dirty play. The FIFA Laws of the Game (initially scrolling down is necessary at this web site) are designed to protect the players from violent behavior. The referees are paid to enforce these laws.
I like to see goals scored as much as any soccer fan, but is it just me that dislikes the sound of the announcer’s "gooooooool"? I think that we all know that a goal was scored.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
The game was played on January 26, 2008. I expected it to be a game of super quality since it was a match between two Argentine top teams: Argentina being one of the world’s top produces world-class players. However I was quite disappointed as these two super rivals battled it out on the soccer field. Only three yellow cards were issued in the first half—far too little in my opinion. The final score was Boca Juniors 2 and River Plate 0. I did not enjoy the match.
It was a war for the most part. The weapons used were tripping and kicking the legs. And, it was a poor passing game with lots of long balls sent up field with no particular player intended for receiving the ball. The game’s first quarter was dominated mostly by River Plate, but soon afterwards, they seemed to lose their edge.
What I also could not understand, even though it is a minor point, is that both goalkeepers were allowed to wear dark uniforms very similar in color to that of Boca’s uniform. I suspect that the shades may have been slightly different, but it was not by much.
Anyway, the game went like this. Boca’s Sebastian Battaglia scored at 19 minutes into the match. There was no defender in front of the net as he stood about 30 yards out from the center of the goal. He kicked a hard side volley from this distance and scored the only goal in the first half.
The game in the second half was mostly dominated by Boca as they were everywhere the ball went. Their energy never seemed to cease; but River’s team seemed to feel their energy leave them. They had much difficulty getting beyond the midfield resulting in mistakes such as trapping and passing errors, and kicking long balls upfield.
At 55 minutes into the game, River Plate’s Ortega got an elbow on the jaw and was subsequently tripped and or pushed, but no yellow card was issued to the offender. At the 57th minute, Boca’s Juan Riquelme kicked the ball to River’s goalkeeper who flat-handed the ball sending it straight up in the air. Boca's Martin Palermo then headed the ball into the back of the net as it descended while holding onto the crossbar with one hand. This goal was caused by a goalkeeper error using his hands the wrong way. At the 58th minute, the 6th yellow card was issued.
Analysis:
The game reminded me of a highly competitive high school game, but at 1.5 times the speed. By that I mean the players made many mistakes by doing plenty of high speed running and kicking long balls, but often not with skillful efficiency. However, in Boca Junior’s favor was their apparent top physical conditioning. This allowed them to maintain a highly energetic pace until the end of the match.
In general, the less than skillful play by these two teams does not reach the standards set by top South American or European teams. I suspect that the impassioned rivalry of both teams’ fans have instilled the need for aggressive play over skillful play.
Also, the refereeing was lacking by allowing both teams to constantly go for the legs of players rather than the ball. The referee clearly should have intervened earlier in the game to curb some of the dirty play. The FIFA Laws of the Game (initially scrolling down is necessary at this web site) are designed to protect the players from violent behavior. The referees are paid to enforce these laws.
I like to see goals scored as much as any soccer fan, but is it just me that dislikes the sound of the announcer’s "gooooooool"? I think that we all know that a goal was scored.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
No. 27—Italian Soccer: Milan vs. Catania--Attack Soccer vs. Defense Soccer vs. Again
by Soccer Coach Albert M. Luongo
This match was aired on January 4, 2008 and ended with the score Catania 2, Milan 1. This was another observation for analyzing attack soccer vs. defense soccer. Most of this game was played with Milan on the attack taking many shots on goal while Catania played with a strong defense shored up by midfielders. Catania, however did make at least one defensive mistake that cost them a goal.
While Catania employed a strong defense, they took advantage of the few times that they had to score. In the 19th minute, Spinesi dribbled the ball up to the goal with no defenders except the goalkeeper opposing him. He then easily scored. Their second goal came at the 26-minute mark when Giuseppe Mascara took a long shot just outside of the penalty area. He was off to the right side of the goal, and scored. Only one nearby defender, just sort of in front of him, allowed him a clear shot. Furthermore, there were only three defenders in the area at the time, not enough to adequately protect it. However, Mascara's goal, although unimpeded, was a beautiful shot due to the accuracy needed from that distance to bypass the Milan goalkeeper.
During the 58th minute, Milan’s Palaschi fought off defenders with his hands (they were grabbing him) as he dribbled the ball toward the goal. He found a hole in the defense and scored; showing great concentration. A little later, about the 72rd minute, Catania did the smart thing and substituted in a defender Sabato. At about the 74th minute, Milan’s Gennaro Sardo kicked Catania’s Serginho and was shown the red card. At this point, with only ten players on the field it became much harder for Milan to catch up with Catania, which of course they never did.
Discussion
1. As I always point out, defense soccer is the way to run a soccer team. Most of the time when Milan was attacking, Catania had at least seven players surrounding the defensive area. In contrast, Milan generally employed only three defense players as the midfielders only infrequently dropped back to help out on defense.
2. Why do some players do stupid things like adding an extra kick after the initial foul? Following this incident, a game with relatively few violent fouls became rough. A player getting ejected seriously compromises one’s team and frequently contributes to losing the match, or in this case, reducing the team’s chances of catching up with the opponents. There were approximately 17 fouls in the first half, but at least they were not violent making the game reasonably pleasant to watch.
3. One positive aspect that I would like to point out is the great shielding of the ball by both teams. The Italians like some South American teams do this very well.
4. Not discussed above are panic shots on goal. They take place in almost every game. What I find hard to understand, especially at the professional level, are shots that seem to be aimed at the sun or moon instead of the goal. Players at this level should know enough to practice getting over the ball before making the kick--getting over the ball tends to keep it from rising too high.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Wednesday, March 5, 2008
No. 26—Spanish Soccer: Barcelona vs. Real Madrid—Comments About Attack Soccer vs. Defense Soccer
By Soccer Coach Albert M. Luongo
Throughout most of the game, with possibly the last half of the second half on December 28, 2007, Barcelona dominated the field with control of the ball and good passing. This style of play is commended, but they lost anyway. The final score of the Match was Madrid 1, Barcelona 0.Real Madrid’s Julio Baptista scored the only goal at minute 35. He received a great pass from teammate Ruud Van Nistelrooy, controlled the pass while running and kicked a hard shot from the goal’s left side into the upper right corner. Barcelona’s goalkeeper Victor Valdes had no chance to save the shot.
This appeared to me as a game between an attacking team--Barcelona opposing Real Madrid, a team shored up by a strong defens. Barcelona had many attacks on goal and chances to score while Real Madrid had relatively few. The difference is that Real Madrid usually had a wall of 7 defensive players spread across the goalmouth forming a strong impedance against attacks. Furthermore, these defensive players did not appear to be chasing opposing attackers dribbling the ball, at any time in the game. Defenders chasing opponents is a sure sign that defensive players are out of position. This was not the case with Barcelona’s defense: The goal scored by Real Madrid’s Baptista was with a clear shot with no opposition from Barcelona except by two defenders chasing him. And Barcelona typically had few, if any, midfielders back at the goal area during dynamic play, i.e., not counting corner kicks and free kicks.
Here is a little added note about a few players: For Real Madrid, one such defender for his defensive role should be commended. He is Sergio Ramos. And for Barcelona, a key playmaker for their attacks is Lionel Messi. Unfortunately for Barcelona, he was absent during this game due to an injury. Messi along with Ronaldinho are quite a powerful combination on the front line.
Which style of soccer do I favor?
Defense, of course. While I was coaching I learned to win championships by thinking first of defense then and only then about offense. After many years of coaching (and playing) I learned that if the defense were in proper order, somehow the offensive players would do their job.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Throughout most of the game, with possibly the last half of the second half on December 28, 2007, Barcelona dominated the field with control of the ball and good passing. This style of play is commended, but they lost anyway. The final score of the Match was Madrid 1, Barcelona 0.Real Madrid’s Julio Baptista scored the only goal at minute 35. He received a great pass from teammate Ruud Van Nistelrooy, controlled the pass while running and kicked a hard shot from the goal’s left side into the upper right corner. Barcelona’s goalkeeper Victor Valdes had no chance to save the shot.
This appeared to me as a game between an attacking team--Barcelona opposing Real Madrid, a team shored up by a strong defens. Barcelona had many attacks on goal and chances to score while Real Madrid had relatively few. The difference is that Real Madrid usually had a wall of 7 defensive players spread across the goalmouth forming a strong impedance against attacks. Furthermore, these defensive players did not appear to be chasing opposing attackers dribbling the ball, at any time in the game. Defenders chasing opponents is a sure sign that defensive players are out of position. This was not the case with Barcelona’s defense: The goal scored by Real Madrid’s Baptista was with a clear shot with no opposition from Barcelona except by two defenders chasing him. And Barcelona typically had few, if any, midfielders back at the goal area during dynamic play, i.e., not counting corner kicks and free kicks.
Here is a little added note about a few players: For Real Madrid, one such defender for his defensive role should be commended. He is Sergio Ramos. And for Barcelona, a key playmaker for their attacks is Lionel Messi. Unfortunately for Barcelona, he was absent during this game due to an injury. Messi along with Ronaldinho are quite a powerful combination on the front line.
Which style of soccer do I favor?
Defense, of course. While I was coaching I learned to win championships by thinking first of defense then and only then about offense. After many years of coaching (and playing) I learned that if the defense were in proper order, somehow the offensive players would do their job.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Saturday, March 1, 2008
No. 25—Atletico Madrid vs. Espanyol Soccer (Football) from Spain: Was this a Soccer Game or Karate?
by Soccer Coach Albert M. Luongo
Espanyol beat Atletico Madrid 2-1 on December 24, 2007. In my opinion the game was played like a hockey match—playing the player, not the ball. This type of dirty playing took place during the first half and partly into the second half. The contest started out with two fouls in the first minute: Normally, experience tells me not to watch a soccer game when it starts out this way; but I decided to do something that I never do. I decided to watch the match and count fouls and balls sent over the touchline. The ball went out of the touch line 6 times in the first 12 minutes and went over the two touchlines a total of 29 times during the match--not as frequently as I had predicted, but still not good. The first half was brutal, as there were 31 takedowns (kicking out the legs) that I counted. The referee did not call several of the fouls or issue several yellow cards that I believe were warranted. Finally on minute 21 a red card was given to Atletico’s Aquero who either slapped or punched an opponent—it was difficult to determine which it was. Even the announcer mentioned that the referee was losing control of the game. Furthermore, on the 28th minute a handball in the penalty area was not called. On the 30th minute there should have been given another red card.
The fouls continued in the second half but the rate was less as I only counted 14 takedowns; however, Athletico’s Penia was given the 2nd red card of the game in the 54th minute of play. This ejection, of course, meant that they would only field 9 players for the rest of the game.
Aside from the violence taking place, there were some good events to point out. Starting with the goals, Atletico’s Simao curved a free kick (awarded for a penalty or course) just to the inside of the right post. Espanyol’s goalkeeper Kameni had no chance to stop this first goal of the game at about minute 36. On the 53rd minute, Espanyol’s Tamudo headed in a quick ball with no chance for the defense or Atletico’s goalkeeper Abbiati to prevent the goal. At minute 85, De la Pena (pronounced Day-la Penya) sent a fast ball to teammate Luis Garcia to once again beat the Atletico goal keeper Abbiati—he had no chance to stop this one either. Some of the best ball shielding came from the Atletico Madrid’s team and they played their hearts out after being down by 2 players. They played a defensive game, especially after being down by losing their first player and most of the team helped out in defense, making penetration difficult. After losing their 2nd player, they could not launch many attacks on goal as the team had to run the whole field to attack their opponent’s goal. But their defense was commendable as Espanyol had many attacks on goal in the latter part of the 2nd half, but with out success until the goal by De la Pena/Garcia: Statistically it was bound to come.
Discussion on Referees.
First of all, I wish to note that I do not mention referees’ names in order to protect them. I do not wish to expose them to any harm. Furthermore, I believe that their names should always be withheld from the public for the same reason. However, soccer (or football) leagues should insist on only using the referees that are firm with offending players. When I refereed soccer (football) matches, I sized up violent players and teams right at the start of the match. In order to be correct and keep each match a clean one, I made sure that I clearly understood and enforced the FIFA Laws of the Game--(Note: at this web site it is necessary to scroll down to see the laws). Thus I exercised my authority immediately when violent fouls (and other fouls) took place, knowing what was coming if I did not do so. That way, there was no doubt in anyone’s mind as to who was in charge. That is the way it is supposed to be! To overlook serious fouls in the beginning sets up a precedent and thus the violent players or teams immediately size up the referee. But when the players realize that the referee stands for no nonsense, they normally back away from playing the player and play the ball. After all, the Laws of the Game have been developed to protect the players and there should be no excuse for those referees that lenient on offenders.
Discussion on Skill vs. Dirty Tactics.
Soccer players should take note of this. Skillful players and teams go on to climb higher in their league. Dirty playing will never be a substitute the proper skills necessary to be recognized by coaches of higher level teams. Proper skills take time and devotion to learn them. Atletico Madrid have the skills to have held Espanyol at bay by keeping them from scoring the winning goal until the last few minutes of the match. If they would have been able to play with 11 players for the duration of the match, the results could have been different. But, due to receiving red cards, the 9 remaining players were enervated (lost their energy) and could no longer sustain good passing attacks. Yet they almost held their opponents to tie game by a super defense. Had they had all 11 players, playing as hard as they played in the latter part of the game, they may have even won the contest.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Espanyol beat Atletico Madrid 2-1 on December 24, 2007. In my opinion the game was played like a hockey match—playing the player, not the ball. This type of dirty playing took place during the first half and partly into the second half. The contest started out with two fouls in the first minute: Normally, experience tells me not to watch a soccer game when it starts out this way; but I decided to do something that I never do. I decided to watch the match and count fouls and balls sent over the touchline. The ball went out of the touch line 6 times in the first 12 minutes and went over the two touchlines a total of 29 times during the match--not as frequently as I had predicted, but still not good. The first half was brutal, as there were 31 takedowns (kicking out the legs) that I counted. The referee did not call several of the fouls or issue several yellow cards that I believe were warranted. Finally on minute 21 a red card was given to Atletico’s Aquero who either slapped or punched an opponent—it was difficult to determine which it was. Even the announcer mentioned that the referee was losing control of the game. Furthermore, on the 28th minute a handball in the penalty area was not called. On the 30th minute there should have been given another red card.
The fouls continued in the second half but the rate was less as I only counted 14 takedowns; however, Athletico’s Penia was given the 2nd red card of the game in the 54th minute of play. This ejection, of course, meant that they would only field 9 players for the rest of the game.
Aside from the violence taking place, there were some good events to point out. Starting with the goals, Atletico’s Simao curved a free kick (awarded for a penalty or course) just to the inside of the right post. Espanyol’s goalkeeper Kameni had no chance to stop this first goal of the game at about minute 36. On the 53rd minute, Espanyol’s Tamudo headed in a quick ball with no chance for the defense or Atletico’s goalkeeper Abbiati to prevent the goal. At minute 85, De la Pena (pronounced Day-la Penya) sent a fast ball to teammate Luis Garcia to once again beat the Atletico goal keeper Abbiati—he had no chance to stop this one either. Some of the best ball shielding came from the Atletico Madrid’s team and they played their hearts out after being down by 2 players. They played a defensive game, especially after being down by losing their first player and most of the team helped out in defense, making penetration difficult. After losing their 2nd player, they could not launch many attacks on goal as the team had to run the whole field to attack their opponent’s goal. But their defense was commendable as Espanyol had many attacks on goal in the latter part of the 2nd half, but with out success until the goal by De la Pena/Garcia: Statistically it was bound to come.
Discussion on Referees.
First of all, I wish to note that I do not mention referees’ names in order to protect them. I do not wish to expose them to any harm. Furthermore, I believe that their names should always be withheld from the public for the same reason. However, soccer (or football) leagues should insist on only using the referees that are firm with offending players. When I refereed soccer (football) matches, I sized up violent players and teams right at the start of the match. In order to be correct and keep each match a clean one, I made sure that I clearly understood and enforced the FIFA Laws of the Game--(Note: at this web site it is necessary to scroll down to see the laws). Thus I exercised my authority immediately when violent fouls (and other fouls) took place, knowing what was coming if I did not do so. That way, there was no doubt in anyone’s mind as to who was in charge. That is the way it is supposed to be! To overlook serious fouls in the beginning sets up a precedent and thus the violent players or teams immediately size up the referee. But when the players realize that the referee stands for no nonsense, they normally back away from playing the player and play the ball. After all, the Laws of the Game have been developed to protect the players and there should be no excuse for those referees that lenient on offenders.
Discussion on Skill vs. Dirty Tactics.
Soccer players should take note of this. Skillful players and teams go on to climb higher in their league. Dirty playing will never be a substitute the proper skills necessary to be recognized by coaches of higher level teams. Proper skills take time and devotion to learn them. Atletico Madrid have the skills to have held Espanyol at bay by keeping them from scoring the winning goal until the last few minutes of the match. If they would have been able to play with 11 players for the duration of the match, the results could have been different. But, due to receiving red cards, the 9 remaining players were enervated (lost their energy) and could no longer sustain good passing attacks. Yet they almost held their opponents to tie game by a super defense. Had they had all 11 players, playing as hard as they played in the latter part of the game, they may have even won the contest.
All of the above information is the author's opinion. This article in no way is meant to degrade, discredit or defame any team or person. Its sole purpose is to improve the skills of young soccer players, coaches and the game itself.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
